 |
 |
This is how far behind our competitors are...
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
All articles claiming this point back to this single, unverified source, AFAICS.
I find this difficult to believe.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't believe a word of that story.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Aaahhhhhh…this makes slightly more sense:
AppleInsider | HP ran its webOS SDK on iPad 2, hopes to license it as mobile web app tool
While early reports suggested that HP had internally got webOS running on Apple's iPad 2 hardware only to find that it purportedly ran "twice as fast" there, the reality is that webOS developers had actually brought their Enyo software development kit to the iPad 2, as AppleInsider has confirmed with a source within the webOS team.
Enyo is HP's JavaScript development framework for building web apps, core to webOS as a platform. Rather than resulting from an extreme difference in hardware, the aspect of Apple's tablet that made it run Enyo webOS apps so much faster is Apple's superior web browser JavaScript performance compared to the less sophisticated, simply named "Web" browser of webOS.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Also:
"OUR" competitors?
Somebody is over-identifying with their tools of choice, no?
(Or do you actually work for Apple?)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Or perhaps he owns Apple stock.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Touchpad uses a 1.2GHz dualcore in-order Snapdragon processor, while the iPad 2 uses a 1 GHz dualcore out of order A5 processor. It's basically a dualcore Atom without HT (Snapdragon) against a Core 2 (A5). While differences in software (the Javascript interpreter) certainly amount for some, the iPad DOES have the more powerful CPU.
|
|
The current Mac Pro is the most out-of-date Mac since the Macintosh Portable
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
The Touchpad uses a 1.2GHz dualcore in-order Snapdragon processor, while the iPad 2 uses a 1 GHz dualcore out of order A5 processor. It's basically a dualcore Atom without HT (Snapdragon) against a Core 2 (A5). While differences in software (the Javascript interpreter) certainly amount for some, the iPad DOES have the more powerful CPU.
Yeah, but running webOS in emulation 2x faster?
apart from that, it's been clarified what's going on, no?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh, it's clear enough that they're talking about "compiled" apps, and the interpreter is a big part of the difference. It is however worth pointing out that the CPU in the iPad 2 is a rather powerful beast.
|
|
The current Mac Pro is the most out-of-date Mac since the Macintosh Portable
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|