[anonymac]

Vista is superior to OS X. It's faster, more compatible, easier, and has virtually every feature that OS X does. Flip 3D must be making the expose developers take a dump in their pants because it is such a brilliant feature that is better implemented than expose.

[Sophus]

Sure... Ehmm... Maybe you should stay off that crack Mr. Troll...

You got to do better than that if you want to start a flamewar. A little more subtle the next time and you might just make it.
;-)

[Visualize]

It's your right to say this. I haven't tried Vista in dual boot on this iMac yet but I do have it running in Parallels. And I must say that i'm not that impressed. Okay, the speed is not up to par because of Parallels but I don't think it's superior to OS X. I for one looked forward to coming back into OS X after having tried Vista Ultimate.

Maybe a dual boot - with proper speed- will change my mind. But I doubt it. My Windows XP experience lasted approx. 3 days.

ciao.

[badsey]

I always swore that Win2000 would be my last version of Windows, but after awhile I did go WinXP <sp2. WinSP2 was horribly slow for me and WinVista needs more ram = slower. I was not impressed with WinVista RC1.

I believe WinBorg is the better alternative here.

OSX is much quicker than any WIndows of the last 8 years. With dual/quad core the difference is even more measurable. Microsoft better get its' act together quickly.

Vista may be necessary for the new MS Office stuff. --> Good reason to go Win Vista.

[Philip J. Fry]

Originally Posted by anonymac 

Vista is superior to OS X. It's faster, more compatible, easier, and has virtually every feature that OS X does. Flip 3D must be making the expose developers take a dump in their pants because it is such a brilliant feature that is better implemented than expose.

More compatible? Have you read the reports about Adobe/Symantec software not working?

[chabig]

Vista IS more compatible with more than 100,000 viruses.

[ghporter]

anonymac, trolling will get you nowhere here. Thread closed.