Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Alternative Operating Systems > Red Hat to support PPC G4 and Altivec

Red Hat to support PPC G4 and Altivec
Thread Tools
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Jacksonville
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 11, 2002, 10:58 AM
 
They signed a deal with Moto. I wonder when the G5 is coming out?

Red Hat story at MacCentral


Sounds like big news for the G4.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nowhereland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2002, 06:48 AM
 
YESSSSSSS! this is wonderful news! [jumps into the air and clap his feet together]

i wonder when i comes out? i can wait!
_______void_______
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2002, 08:43 AM
 
Originally posted by v0id7:
<STRONG>YESSSSSSS! this is wonderful news! [jumps into the air and clap his feet together]

i wonder when i comes out? i can wait!</STRONG>
Wow, this is awesome news. I'm not a large fan of RedHat or anything, but anything that supports PowerPC and AltiVec is worth a try for me.
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"

     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2002, 08:42 PM
 
So how is this different from Yellow Dog Linux that supports the G4 and Altivec?
B&W G3/300 OS X 10.3 Server
AL G4/1.5 OS X 10.3
Next computer G5/3.X Ghz OS X 10.x.x
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nowhereland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2002, 11:14 AM
 
"So how is this different from Yellow Dog Linux that supports the G4 and Altivec?"

Redhat is better.
_______void_______
     
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago, Earth
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2002, 11:27 AM
 
Originally posted by v0id7:
<STRONG>"So how is this different from Yellow Dog Linux that supports the G4 and Altivec?"

Redhat is better.</STRONG>
Well, that answers everything.
MBP - 2.33GHz C2D, 3GB RAM, 256MB VRAM, 160GB HD
PB - 1.5GHz G4, 2GB RAM, 128MB VRAM, 80GB HD
PM - Dual 1GHzG4, 1.5GB RAM, NVidia GForce 3, 2x 80 GB HD
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2002, 02:56 PM
 
Originally posted by v0id7:
<STRONG>"So how is this different from Yellow Dog Linux that supports the G4 and Altivec?"

Redhat is better.</STRONG>
So with YDL 2.2 having a Red Hat 7.2 Foundation, how is Red Hat better?
B&W G3/300 OS X 10.3 Server
AL G4/1.5 OS X 10.3
Next computer G5/3.X Ghz OS X 10.x.x
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2002, 05:10 PM
 
YDL is based off of RedHat and always has been. Saying RH is better is just ridiculous. YDL was a scratch an itch distro meant to fill the void left by there not being a really workable PPC distro. They based it off RH in order to have a working base which they could port. Now that RH and SuSE and others support PPC YDL is slowly becoming redundant but it is pretty much analguous to RH.

2GHz 15" MacBook Pro, 120GB 5400rpm HD, 2GB RAM
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Antioch
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 18, 2002, 01:41 AM
 
Originally posted by v0id7:
<STRONG>"So how is this different from Yellow Dog Linux that supports the G4 and Altivec?"

Redhat is better.</STRONG>
Bull.
This is something I know about-

I worked heavily with both YDL and Red Hat when I worked for Abriasoft.

Most of the distro was identical- as in SAME src.rpm's but just compiled on the other platform.
There were a *few* minor revisions to patch Makefiles and occasionally code, but those seemed to make it into the Red Hat updates as well.

YDL and Red Hat for all practical purposes are the same distro.

Red Hat wanted nothing to do with ppc chip.
They were more interested in Sparc64

So LinuxPPC and YDL filled the void. And MKLinux, too.
Sparc64 linux ends up not selling well (not surprising- why run linux on hardware that comes with Solaris?)

So now RH wants to go to PowerPC?

Screw em.
They had their chance.

Let's support the distro's that showed early interest in ppc
Distro's that made ppc linux what it now is.

MKLinux, LinuxPPC, YDL, Debian

SuSE too, they were late in the game- but their money was largely responsible for good USB support.
Don't take candy from strangers
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nowhereland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 18, 2002, 05:54 AM
 
sorry guys, i was just excited. i posted out of speculation and what ive heard from a friend about redhat on pc.
_______void_______
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2