[subego]

Direct quote from Apple's new guidelines.

Daring Fireball: A Taste of What's New in the Updated App Store License Agreement and New Review Guidelines

[Demonhood]

Good.
It's about time there was even a bit more transparency about what is and isn't allowed in the store.

[Stogieman]

Congratulations subego, your thread made the MacNN front page!.

[Brien]

I think it's hilarious.

[ghporter]

"I know it when I see it." Excellent. Broad enough to cover every fart app ever conceived, specific enough for "we found it offensive and without redeeming qualities," and clear enough to remind submitters that Apple is in charge.

The most entertaining part is that they have specifically reminded submitters that "the more expensive your app, the more thoroughly we will review it." Also excellent. If you want to make a mint off of the platform, be prepared to defend it like a PhD dissertation.

[subego]

These are definitely good first steps.

It still seems like there needs to be more communication with developers during the process. Though this will help, you really need some sort of "pre-authorization" for developers. Nothing binding, but something which will let you know if a specific feature is likely to be rejected.

Hell, you could even charge a couple hundred bucks for the service.

That probably won't happen, but it'd be nice.