Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Lawsuit: Apple let SD-only customers rent HD movies, kept the change

Lawsuit: Apple let SD-only customers rent HD movies, kept the change
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2013, 11:20 PM
 
A San Francisco man is suing Apple for formerly allowing people who rent high-definition movies even though their equipment is incapable of displaying the format -- meaning the customers who didn't understand the difference essentially got charged $1 more than they should to rent movies or other videos from the iTunes store. Apple has since corrected the issue, and now displays a warning when HD-renting customers are using standard-definition (SD) devices, but plaintiff Scott J. Weiselberg claims that while the rented movie would fall back to SD automatically, Apple kept the $1 HD premium charge.

Weiselberg gave the specific example that he owned an iPhone 3G, which does not display HD material. He rented the movie Big Daddy for $4.99 in June of 2010, and claims to have been unaware that an SD version of the movie was available for $3.99.

At the time, Apple had two buttons for movie rental choices, offering the SD or HD (which at the time meant 720p) version and displaying the price, much as the store does now. Weisenberg claims that Apple capitalized on the confusion, pocketing "millions of dollars in undeserved profits," though he does not offer any proof that anyone apart from himself accidentally rented an HD movie when they did not have equipment capable of playing it back at that resolution. While he is probably not the only person to have made the mistake, his brief offers no evidence of anyone else who had the issue.

The HD option is generally the preferred or default option for movie rentals nowadays, but at the time Apple failed to disclose to customers using older Apple devices that their machines could not play any HD content they would rent, and would fall back to the SD version. If that happened, the company did not adjusting the rental rate to reflect this, Weisenberg says. Apple may have an excuse for that claim, however, as its movie rental service has always allowed users to switch among devices -- some of which would have been capable of displaying the HD content.

Weisenberg is filing his complaint as a class-action lawsuit in Federal court, saying that Apple's policy at the time constituted "fraudulent omission" in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. He seeks restitution, disgorgement of the allegedly ill-gotten profits, an injunction and damages for "unjust enrichment."


( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jul 8, 2013 at 11:20 PM. )
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mississauga
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 05:45 AM
 
Scott J. Weiselberg is a boob. Once again, only the lawyer will profit from this.
* * * * *Alec
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 10:54 AM
 
This is fun! I have a DVD player hooked up to an old SD TV in my basement. Now I can sue Netflix for all the DVDs I've watched because the TV I have is only capable of SD display!!!!
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 11:27 AM
 
Great, it is because of idiots like him that I now have to switch the resolution on my 15" rMBP to scaled 1920X1200 to purchase some HD movies now. Thanks a lot Scott. Can we all sue him for making our lives harder? Let's launch a class action lawsuit against Scott J. Weiselberg. Who's with me?
--
Aristotle
15" rMBP 2.7 Ghz ,16GB, 768GB SSD, 64GB iPhone 5 S⃣ 128GB iPad Air LTE
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 11:58 AM
 
This is idiocy. Is he outraged at Target for selling BlueRay discs without asking customers if their equipment can support it?
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 02:29 PM
 
I misread this headline as "SSD-only" and was wondering what the heck this had to do with hard drives...
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2013, 05:48 PM
 
I say give him his $1 back and send him home.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2