Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Apple recommends against Icahn buyback scheme in new SEC filing

Apple recommends against Icahn buyback scheme in new SEC filing
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 28, 2013, 12:30 AM
As previously mentioned, filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission have revealed that Apple is recommending against predatory investor Carl Icahn's official shareholder proposal, which has the aim of forcing Apple to accelerate and expand its existing stock-buyback program to repurchase an additional $50 billion in shares over and above its existing buyback program. Icahn's proposal would see Apple required to buy the $50 billion in extra shares during the fiscal 2014 year.

Icahn's proposal reads as follows: "RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, High River's proposal that Apple commit to completing not less than $50 billion of share repurchases during Apple's fiscal year ending September 27, 2014 (and increase the amount authorized for share repurchases under its Capital Return Program accordingly)." While the proposal is a step down from Icahn's original demands to more than double the existing $60 billion repurchase program, it asks for Apple to purchase shares very aggressively on a strict timetable rather than waiting strategically for strong buying opportunities.

Such a proposal, if enacted by stockholders at the company's annual meeting on February 28, would force Apple to go further into debt in order to finance the buyback. While Apple has around $150 billion in cash reserves, most of it -- around $115 billion -- is held offshore. CEO Tim Cook has said that Apple intends to use its foreign earnings for foreign operations and expansion, and will not "repatriate" the funds since the money would, in Apple's view, be "double-taxed" -- and bringing the money into the US would trigger taxes that might claim as high as 35 percent of the cash brought in.

From Apple's perspective, it has saved literally billions by borrowing to finance the current round of buyback purchases, and by timing those purchases to periods where the stock was undervalued. Apple's original proposal was to spend $100 billion in stock repurchases over a period of up to three years, however it has already spent some $43 billion on the program already, capturing and retiring stock during periods of devaluation and paying out dividends. It spent over $23 billion in 2013 alone, buying up devalued shares when the price was lower than it is now.

Icahn himself now holds at least 4.7 million shares of AAPL, roughly a $2.7 billion stake in the company. Despite this, Apple has indicated in its filings that it will advise shareholders to vote against Icahn's proposal, saying that the Board and management team are "fully committed to returning cash to shareholders" but that they are "thoughtfully considering options for returning additional cash to shareholders and are currently seeking input from shareholders as part of the Company's regular review." Icahn's proposal is very unlikely to succeed, despite the short-term rewards to investors, as Icahn's plan doesn't make any strategic sense for the long-term health of the company.

The proxy statement filed by Apple indicates that the company plans to announce changes to the current buyback program -- if any -- following a review that should be complete in March or April of next year. It notes that it is not against the idea of further stock repurchase plans or an expansion of the existing program, but is against Icahn's specific proposal.

Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: loc
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 28, 2013, 08:02 PM
This scheme only benefits people who got into AAPL on the run-up to its peak. Like Icahn, who's AAPL is somewhere in the 400s. He's clearly not willing to wait until it grows based on plain old value. It's by definition self-serving on his part. So it's not in the best interest of the company. Stockholders agree to take some risk and the steering wheel they have for the board and management is supposed to be turning in the direction of growth.
Just sayin'
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 30, 2013, 12:52 PM
beyond the IPO (in which a company receives real money for its stock), all stockholders are by definition leeches, providing no value to a company in exchange for conniving to extract as much free money from it as possible.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2