Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Report: Apple dodged taxes on $8.9B in Australian profits

Report: Apple dodged taxes on $8.9B in Australian profits
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 02:48 AM
 
Apple's practice over the past decade of funnelling all of its foreign profits through its international sales office in Cork, Ireland has allowed it to skip out on taxes in some other countries on billions of dollars in profits, according to an audit done by the Australian Financial Review. In Australia, Apple has paid only $200 million on ten years' worth of profits, totally nearly AUS $9 billion, the report said.



Apple Sales International (ASI), Apple's Ireland-based foreign sales office, takes advantage of a loophole in Irish law that foreign companies which are "managed" by outside countries, and thus is not "tax resident" in Ireland. This means it doesn't have to pay the usual 12.5 percent tax of Irish corporations, and allows Apple to transfer profits made in other countries as royalties on its intellectual property, based on its patents, to Ireland. ASI then contributes its money to Apple's overall research and development costs, giving ASI a legal stake in the company's intellectual property.

Sometime in 2010, Apple opened and may have begun routing Australian profits through an office in Singapore rather than Ireland, but the effect was the same: taxes were avoided in a perfectly legal manner by taking full advantage of tax breaks and the differences in international regulations. In Australia, the incorporation of Apple there can thus report much lower profits than what it actually made there, and pay taxes on only the money that's left after the bulk of profits have been transferred to Ireland (or Singapore as case may be).

The practices Apple engages in with regards to its taxes -- researching and employing any loopholes -- are followed by most multi-national corporations and tech companies, so much so that the technique has a name: "Double Irish with a Dutch sandwich." Efforts by the various countries to stem the various tax-dodging schemes usually fails because of an inability to enforce rules across the multitude of countries involved.

For its part, Irish Michael Noonan has said he plans to reform his country's "tax residence" loophole, which would allow Ireland to tax ASI at the normal corporate rate, but in all likelihood Apple would simply move its European headquarters to another country with more favorable tax rates. ASI in Ireland has, over the past five years, reported some $100 billion in profit -- and paid $5 million in taxes.

For 2013, Apple Australia reported pretax earnings of only $88.5 million -- because some $2 billion had already been sent to ASI. In 2012, the Australian Tax Office reports, Apple took in nearly $5 billion in overall revenue, but paid only a total $94.7 million in taxes. Australian officials in 2012 charged Apple another $28.5 million for back taxes, and officials have said they will try to recover more of the millions Apple has avoided paying under the scheme.



Ultimately, the real solution to the problem is global tax reform so that Apple and other multi-national companies can't play one country's tax codes off another. A surprising advocate of reform is, of all people, Apple CEO Tim Cook -- who has met with Congressional leaders and Irish Finance Minister Noonan on the topic, and advocated for proposals similar to President Obama's ideas on corporate tax loophole closing. In the meantime, Cook is legally obligated by a fiduciary duty to shareholders to seek out any tax-avoidance strategies (provided they are legal) as part of his responsibility to maximize profits.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in front of my computer
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 08:07 AM
 
"Cook is legally obligated by a fiduciary duty to shareholders to seek out any tax-avoidance strategies (provided they are legal) as part of his responsibility to maximize profits."

This.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 09:12 AM
 
Tim Cook needs to practice what he preaches. It's not against the law to not use these nasty little money-shuffling loopholes.
Author of Untangling Tolkien and Chesterton on War and Peace
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 09:32 AM
 
And not to overlook the obvious but seeming always forgotten fact. "Corporations don't pay taxes, they collect them for the government." Any tax on a corporation is simply added to the product price and paid by, you guessed it, YOU. Corporate taxes are just another hidden tax on the consumer. There should be no corporate taxes anywhere. All tax monies come from the people. If we were to easily see all the hidden taxes, and fees we are paying, I suspect there would be a tax revolt.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 12:14 PM
 
As @jfelbab said, corporate taxes are just passed to the customer.

The first country that eliminates corporate income taxes becomes the biggest job creator on the planet.
- MacBook Pro 15" Core i7 2.3Ghz / 256SSD (Work laptop)
- iMac 3.2Ghz 1TB
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 12:56 PM
 
"taxes were avoided in a perfectly legal manner" Then the article should end there. End of story. Not even relevant...
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 01:22 PM
 
"Any tax on a corporation is simply added to the product price and paid by, you guessed it, YOU."

If the corporation avoids a tax, do they pass the savings on to the customer?
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 02:39 PM
 
No. No they do not. (I guess I should say, no. generally not.)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Excellent, the sports issue is within arm's reach, I'll be here all day.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 02:54 PM
 
Austrailian profit holders have the liberty of being intaxicated anyway; sharing is caring...
This one time, at Boot Camp, I stuck a flute up my PC.
     
MacNN Editor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2014, 06:13 PM
 
FireWire, I think you're missing the point of the story. It's not about Apple (except as an example) -- it's about how corporations (all or most of them) get away with paying less than their fair share because of lack of inter-governmental cooperation.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2014, 10:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by jfelbab View Post
And not to overlook the obvious but seeming always forgotten fact. "Corporations don't pay taxes, they collect them for the government." Any tax on a corporation is simply added to the product price and paid by, you guessed it, YOU. Corporate taxes are just another hidden tax on the consumer. There should be no corporate taxes anywhere. All tax monies come from the people. If we were to easily see all the hidden taxes, and fees we are paying, I suspect there would be a tax revolt.
That, I guess, was a paid announcement for Ayn Rand or the Koch brothers.

In the United States, at least, corporations are consider under law to be the same as individuals (thus the Citizens United decision and the huge amounts of corporate cash donated secretly to tax-free "educational and cultural" organizations that re just fronts for PACs). If individuals' income is taxed, corporations' have to be as well.

The above quote is also a fair statement of late 19th-century, robber baron politics. And sure, why shouldn't we concentrate the wealth of this country even further in the hands of a fraction of 1% of the population --- after all, we are rapidly approaching the time when only they will have the excess income to invest. And they already are the only ones allowed into the exclusive clubs of essentially unregulated hedge funds.

Fie upon this, sir, fie! Tax all income, of whatever type, at the rates at which individual income is taxed. The argument that corporate profits are taxed "more than once" is absurd on the face of it when you consider that every dollar you earn (taxed for income tax if you're above the poverty level) is taxed again and again as it changes hands among merchants, they employees, and yes, even their suppliers, such as Apple.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2