Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Cote rules against Apple again; no dismissal on states' e-book suit

Cote rules against Apple again; no dismissal on states' e-book suit
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2014, 10:18 PM
For observers in Apple's battle against the US Department of Justice over alleged e-book "price fixing," it will come as no shock whatsoever that Judge Denise Cote has ruled against the company on a connected legal matter -- but the fact that she actually cited a reasoning based in law this time may surprise some. The US District Court judge has refuted Apple's filing for a dismissal in the lawsuits brought by 33 states and territories based on the DOJ case ruling.

The attorneys general of the states in question are suing for additional damages based on Apple's conviction in the first DOJ lawsuit that it led a conspiracy among publishers to break Amazon's abusive monopoly on e-book prices by daring to enter the market using a publisher-friendly pricing model rather than predatory undercutting of e-book prices as Amazon was doing. Judge Cote had pre-announced prior to the trial beginning that Apple was likely to be guilty of the charges, and accordingly found so --despite contradictory testimony from Google and Amazon executives.

The trial for the states' case is scheduled to start on July 14, and Apple had complained to the court that the states had no standing to seek damages -- saying that the states themselves had not alleged that they suffered any injury. In fact, e-book prices have fallen overall since Apple and others entered the market by introducing competition, which meant that Amazon was forced to give up its "wholesale" model and predatory pricing actions anyway.

Judge Cote dismissed the complaint, saying that Apple had not challenged the states' standing in its pursuance of the lawsuit originally, or when it obtained an injunction in September following the ruling which called for the appointment of an external compliance monitor. In something of a tradition for the judge, she again failed to directly address Apple's actual contention, however. Although Apple is appealing Judge Cote's verdict with the Second Court of Appeals, the class-action lawsuits filed by the states and consumer groups can proceed based on the original case.

"Apple has cited no authority to support the distinction it is advocating here between the standing to seek an end to an antitrust violation and the standing to seek damages for that violation," she wrote in her decision. The states are seeking $280 million in damages, but a finding of willful price-fixing (which seems a foregone conclusion with Judge Cote in charge) could triple the damages to as high as $840 million.
The Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Well the sports issue was within arm's reach but they closed up shop and kicked me out. And I'm out of toilet paper.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 16, 2014, 10:04 AM
Can I have some of that $840 million? A few thousand wouldn't hurt, I promise to give it back (little by little).
This one time, at Boot Camp, I stuck a flute up my PC.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2