Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > NVIDIA outs budget-priced GeForce 660 and 650 cards

NVIDIA outs budget-priced GeForce 660 and 650 cards
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2012, 08:14 AM
 
NVIDIA is attempting to appeal to budget-conscious PC gamers with its latest pair of offerings. The Kepler-based GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650 will cost $229 and $109, respectively. The former has 2GB of dedicated RAM and 960 CUDA cores along with a GPU Boost mode that automatically overclocks it as needed. There is also a 980MHz core clock onboard.

NVIDIA cites a four-fold performance improvement when compared to the older GeForce 9800GT card. The quoted frame rates in games like Borderlands 2 and Guild Wars 2 at 1,920 by 1,080 resolutions and 3D are said to be 51fps and 41fps, respectively. The GTX 650 is the least costly Kepler card NVIDIA will release, lacking GPU Boost. It has a 1,058MHz clock speed and NVIDIA claims eight-time better performance than the 9500 GT(II). There is 1GB of dedicated RAM and 384 CUDA Cores. The cards are now shipping as standalone products and bundled with systems from a number of manufacturers.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2012, 08:21 AM
 
Originally Posted by NewsPoster View Post
The GTX 650 is the least costly Kepler card NVIDIA will release, lacking GPU Boost. It has a 1,058MHz clock speed and NVIDIA claims eight-time better performance than the 9500 GT(II). There is 1GB of dedicated RAM and 384 CUDA Cores.
Actually no. The GT 640 is the least costly Kepler card, and it was released months ago. Same chip, but only with DDR3 memory (the 650 has GDDR5 support) and probably lower clocks.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2