Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > High-profile console, PC games failing in iOS transitions

High-profile console, PC games failing in iOS transitions
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 26, 2012, 11:05 AM
 
Some major game franchises are failing to carry over their success from the PC and consoles to iOS, BGR notes. One example is the port of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, originally developed by Rockstar for the PC and PS2. Although the iOS game hit second place on the US iPhone app chart on December 8, it fell to 36th place by December 22; it only climbed back to 25th place on Christmas Day. The title is doing still worse on the iPad charts, having sunk to 52nd by yesterday. In terms of revenue the game is only 75th, despite costing $5.

Baldur's Gate: Enhanced Edition, an iPad port of a famous BioWare role-playing game, has slipped out of the top 200 in terms of revenue. That may be a result of the title's $10 cost. By contrast, many native iPad games are priced at $5 or less, although in many cases that excludes in-app purchases. Some franchises not based on old games from yesteryear are succeeding, however. Minecraft: Pocket Edition is currently fifth in paid iPad downloads and sixth in terms of revenue. t's doing even better in the iPhone charts, where it's third for both downloads and revenue, in spite of a $7 pricetag. Rockstar's Grand Theft Auto 3 is ninth amongst iPhone downloads, but costs just 99 cents.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 26, 2012, 09:59 PM
 
No wonder that games simply fail to remain popular as ios ports. Playing them with some drawn controllers on the display is really annoying and kills any joy in playing a game. For some games ios devices work good and for a lot of them they simply don't work. When I play, I prefer to use a physical controler instead of taping on the screen.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 27, 2012, 04:08 AM
 
I almost got Vice City for my iPad but was hesitant (actually, the app size is what made me decide not to).

Why did it fall off the charts? I figured it's probably a watered down version of the console game? It sounds like everyone got excited about the announcement, then bought it, and realized it sucked. Apple can claim their iOS devices to be a superb gaming platform, but when:

  • (most) native apps are novice quality time wasters, and
  • the premium quality titles (e.g. Gameslop) force you to spend $$$ through the in-app purchases, and
  • console ports suck because of the lack of physical controls


...it isn't going to happen. Period.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 27, 2012, 08:25 AM
 
The porting quality is great. IMO, if a ten-year-old video game reaches number two on the charts and then stays within the top 25, calling that a "failure" is laughable.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 27, 2012, 10:07 AM
 
I agree w/ SegNerd...why would anyone expect a 10 year old game to garner huge excitement just because it can be played now on an iPad? Comparatively speaking, a "new" game like Infinity Blade has been a huge success on the iPad. Or how about Angry Birds which started on iPhone, became a worldwide success, and can now be played just about anywhere. Do you think as many people play Angry Birds on PC as play on smartphones/tablets? Not even close!
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 27, 2012, 10:33 AM
 
Originally Posted by pairof9s View Post
Do you think as many people play Angry Birds on PC as play on smartphones/tablets? Not even close!
While the Angry Birds success is commendable and the developers are probably now millionaires, it's still just a time waster.

But despite that- like I said in my third previous point, most ports are lacking because even being 10 years old- they have to adapt to an entirely different control mechanism, for a game that wasn't designed for it. It's kind of like the porting problem the Wii and the Wii U have- taking a game designed for a classic controller and then trying to make it work with motion controls or the new tablet.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 28, 2012, 07:20 AM
 
Originally Posted by Grendelmon View Post
While the Angry Birds success is commendable and the developers are probably now millionaires, it's still just a time waster.
I agree with your point too, but I feel it's more a combination of our two posts. There will always be less enthusiasm for a much older game than during its original launch, regardless of the platform.

But as for the "time waster", that really gets to the heart of a different matter. Just like the popularity of tablets now over PCs, games like Angry Birds are vastly successful because they don't require the need for high levels of experience, hardware and time to use in comparison to the complexity of most popular PC games.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2