Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Greenlight wins injunction on Apple preferred stock vote [U]

Greenlight wins injunction on Apple preferred stock vote [U]
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 22, 2013, 04:42 PM
 
[Update: Apple pulls measure, issues statement] US District Judge Richard Sullivan has ruled in favor of Greenlight Capital, and issued an injunction against an Apple shareholder vote on issuing preferred stock, Reuters reports. The proposal was to have been brought up at Apple's annual shareholder meeting on February 27. Greenlight is pursuing a lawsuit against Apple in the belief that if passed, the measure would prevent a preferred stock plan it wants from being considered.

Apple CEO Tim Cook has called the case a "silly sideshow," and argued that the measure would benefit shareholders since it requires their vote on issuing preferred stock. The head of Greenlight, David Einhorn, has claimed that the proposal violates SEC rules about bundling multiple proposals together; Apple insists that the SEC has already reviewed the matter. At stake is Apple's $137 billion in cash reserves, which people like Einhorn have argued should be used in part to reward investors. The company has already begun limited dividend and stock buyback programs, and suggested that it might consider going further, but in the past has claimed the need to keep money in reserve for corporate acquisitions, economic slumps, and other potential costs. Paying for Einhorn's scheme would require Apple to repatriate some of its overseas cash, taking a hit in US taxes. [Update] In reaction to the court decision, Apple has opted to pull the contested proposal, known as Proposal #2, from the ballot to be presented to shareholders at the annual meeting. As a result, the option to issue or not issue so-called "preferred stock" continues to rest solely with the discretion of Apple's board per the company's original charter. Apple issued a statement on the matter, saying it was "disappointed" with the court's ruling. "Proposal #2 is part of our efforts to further enhance corporate governance and serve our shareholders' best interests," the company said. "Unfortunately, due to today's decision, shareholders will not be able to vote on Proposal #2 at our annual meeting next week."
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Feb 22, 2013 at 09:44 PM. )
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 22, 2013, 05:57 PM
 
I guess what Einhorn is saying is that it would be easier for him to bribe, err, "lobby", the Board of Directors individually than it would be to "lobby" the Board of Directors AND all of the shareholders. Assuming his ultimate intent is preventing the shareholders from having a say (as regards preferred stock). Didn't one Judge say Apple could simply unbundle the proposal and vote on each item separately? If it does go through I'd imagine Oinkhorn, given his character, suing the shareholders for not being as smart as he is and causing him economic harm.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 22, 2013, 07:34 PM
 
Apple followers know how easy it is for a US company to topple and fail. Apple was two quarters away from oblivion 15 years ago and of course it is now conservative with its money. The hard times will hit Apple again....as long as the company exists there will be ups and downs. The longer it exists the more it will face. It is no different to cyclical events in nature. By holding onto its money it ensures it will continue to survive during the down periods and allow this US company to continue to innovate and employ people. Of course, Einhorn is not so long sighted. He thinks that a company survives best by living on the edge and scraping through with bare bones reserves each quarter. People like this are dangerous and greedy. It is because of greedy people like this nob that the US economy is in such dire straights at the moment....living on the edge and just hoping the next pay check comes in. What a terd!!!!
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 22, 2013, 09:27 PM
 
Einhorn is a major turd. A worthless human being. Time he went home and put us all out of his misery.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 23, 2013, 01:14 AM
 
So he sued Apple just so Apple could end up ignoring him anyway?
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2