Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Apple iPhone could have been dubbed the 'Tripod'

Apple iPhone could have been dubbed the 'Tripod'
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 06:02 AM
 
Former Apple marketing executive Ken Segall has revealed some of the possible names that the Cupertino giant had been mulling for its halo iPhone product line. Among the possibilities were 'Tripod,' 'Mobi,' 'Telepod,' and 'iPad,' reports 9to5Mac . Apple, of course, ultimately settled on the iPhone name, but was also forced to settle with Cisco for the rights to use it, after it was launched.

Segall also elaborated on the options, revealing why they were on the table. According to Segall, 'Tripod' was seriously considered because it was felt that it represented the three key pillars of what made the device unique. Apple ultimately placed a heavy emphasis on the iPhone's convergence of phone, iPod and Internet communicator in its sales pitch. The App Store phenomenon was not conceived of at the time and came over a year after its launch. 'Telepod' was also considered because of its futuristic play with the words 'telephone' and 'iPod.' It also represented the convergence of two devices, a technological trend that the late Steve Jobs publicly rejected ahead of the launch of the iPhone, perhaps to throw competitors off Apple's trail. 'Mobi' was considered a catchy shortened version of mobile that also had a 'personality.' Finally, 'iPad' was also considered before it eventually was bestowed on Apple's breakthrough tablet. Steve Jobs revealed in the Walter Isaacson biography that the iPad was in development sometime before the iPhone was conceived. Apple was not sure how to pitch the iPad, but saw a market for the operating system if it was applied to a new class of smartphone.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Mar 5, 2013 at 04:14 PM. )
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 07:58 AM
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YHyEC_xG5A
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 10:35 AM
 
" ... ultimately settled on the iPhone name, but not *before* it settled with Cisco for the rights to use it, *after* it was launched."

This statement cannot be true as phrased. Apple could not have settled with Cisco before launch but also after it launched. For the record it was after, but whichever you are arguing, it cannot be both and certainly not in the same sentence.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2