Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > VirnetX loses patent infringement case against Cisco

VirnetX loses patent infringement case against Cisco
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2013, 11:49 AM
 
Cisco has won in a patent infringement trial against patent-licensing firm VirnetX. A jury in a Texas court found in favor of Cisco Systems, confirming that it did not infringe on VirnetX Holding Corp's patents relating to secure network communications, and rejecting a demand from VirnetX for $258 million in damages.

The patents involved concern an implementation of virtual private networks (VPN), namely those used in Cisco's Unified Communications Manager, Telepresence, or AnyConnect in its routers, phones, and software, reports Bloomberg. The patents themselves are being reviewed by the US Patent and Trademark Office, though this was not disclosed to jurors during the trial. General counsel for Cisco Mark Chandler thanked the jury for agreeing "with Cisco that our accused products do not use VirnetX's technology," and that Cisco would "continue to do the right thing for our customers and shareholders by vigorously defending against patent infringement lawsuits that lack merit." Hours before the verdict, Chandler testified before the House Judiciary Committee on patent litigation, and revealed that Cisco spends $50 million per year fighting 50 lawsuits against patent owners, many of which do not make products that use the patents. While this is a setback to VirnetX, it has managed to win other cases under the same or similar patents. It claimed $200 million from Microsoft in 2010, while last month, a ruling that Apple had to pay $368 million to VirnetX was upheld and expanded, forcing Apple to pay $330,211 per day until the two companies settle on royalties and other factors.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2013, 02:58 PM
 
Its sad to see these companies that only sue for patents that they bought or suddenly fine useful for lawsuits.

Now, I have nothing against a company getting fair value for its work, but many of these older patents were written so large that even if the description did not match their product, it could be used in the "rocket docket" of East Texas where the town of Marshall depends on the money these suits brings in to survive.

It is just so sad.
Reality, what a concept! :-)
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2