Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Microsoft, Intel back Apple in CAFC filings against Motorola

Microsoft, Intel back Apple in CAFC filings against Motorola
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2013, 01:26 AM
 
Two of the industry's heaviest hitters on Wednesday filed amicus curae ("friend of the court") briefs with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in support of Apple's position in its appeal over the dismissal last year of a two-way lawsuit with Motorola over patents and FRAND licensing. Microsoft and Intel, who were not involved in the original case, have filed briefs with the court supporting Apple's position that companies should not be allowed to sue over possible infringement of FRAND-eligible patent use.

Last summer, federal Judge Richard A. Posner dismissed two simultaneous cases of alleged patent infringement from Apple and Motorola against each other, saying neither company could prove that any harm had been done to them by any potential infringement. Google (as owner of Motorola) has appealed the ruling, saying that Posner's ruling -- which barred the company from seeking injunctive relief on SEPs -- was incorrect, and that the move devalues SEPs by basing value of a "fair, reasonable and non-discrimatory" (FRAND) license on the intrinsic value of an invention rather than post-standardization hold-up value (how much it would cost companies to create a workaround).

Google and its subsidiary Motorola have been actively seeking ways around such rulings, even defying a consent decree the search giant signed with the FTC promising it would withdraw injunctive-relief requests from litigation involving SEPs. Most recently it has justified one continuing lawsuit by suddenly claiming that Apple was an "unwilling licensee" in order to dodge the decree's restrictions.

Apple is seeking to appeal the portion of Posner's ruling that said Apple had failed to show any significant damage it needed relief from in its non-SEP patent claim against Motorola. The company also seeks to rebuff Google's position, and have the SEP and FRAND portions of Posner's ruling upheld. The latter portion is what Microsoft and Intel have filed briefs in support of. BlackBerry also filed a brief but did not take sides, instead asking the CAFC to rule definitively on whether injunctive relief can ever be available to holders of SEPs as a remedy for infringement.

Microsoft's motion to file an amicus brief argues that the issues Google and Motorola are asking the court to address -- including a standard for valuing SEPs and a ruling on the question of injunctive relief are not actually relevant parts of the appeals. It adds that "beyond that, the positions Motorola asks this Court to adopt" -- the 2.25 percent Google-pushed "standard" royalty and the ability to sue "unwilling licensees" as it chooses -- "are contrary to law and inimical to sound public policy."

It continues, saying "Microsoft's interest in this appeal goes beyond its interest as Motorola's adversary in other cases involving standard-essential patents. While both Microsoft and Apple have publicly declared that they will not seek injunctions on standard-essential patents, other holders of such patents are, like Motorola, actively pursuing injunctions in both the federal courts and the International Trade Commission.

"As an active participant in many SSOs, as well as an implementer of many technical standards in its products, Microsoft has an interest in ensuring that these standards are broadly implemented, and that the public is able to reap the benefits of standardization. These aims would be frustrated by adoption of the approaches to injunctions and damages urged by Motorola."


( Last edited by NewsPoster; Apr 17, 2013 at 05:45 AM. )
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2