Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Report: Apple 'cheap' iPhone actually a mid-price device?

Report: Apple 'cheap' iPhone actually a mid-price device?
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 3, 2013, 11:28 PM
 
Two analysts from Wall Street investment bankers JP Morgan have produced an analysis of possible scenarios for the rumored (but not announced) "low cost" iPhone model expected to debut later this year, aimed at the large worldwide "prepaid" market. Based both on research of existing entries in that market space as well as Apple traditions, Gokul Hariharan and Mark Moskowitz believe that when Apple does bring out the device, it will not be a cheap "bargain" iPhone but instead a "mid-range" entry that should cost between $350 and $400.

While still expensive by the standards of some developing markets, the price would represent a substantial discount from the existing iPhone 5, which costs more than $650 to purchase without a contract in the US and substantially more elsewhere. The pair believe Apple will follow the course set by the introduction of the iPad mini, which was far from the lowest-priced entry in its 7-to-8-inch category but significantly less than the full-size model -- and quickly came to dominate sales, reports AllThingsD.

The key, as seen in both the iPod nano and iPad mini products, is to make an iPhone that is very distinctly different from the premium iPhones, but still bearing the core features consumers want in its own high-quality design. This cheaper iPhone, which would be more affordable to buy outright, would sit comfortably in the middle of the range of smartphone prices -- a better unit than the junky low-end, not as expensive or bound to a contract as the flagship smartphones -- which is, by comparison with the two price extremes, lightly populated with worthwhile competitors.

The theory is in keeping with Apple's desire to maintain quality standards but find less-expensive options wherever possible. The Mac mini, designed from the ground up to be an entry-level Mac to entice potential "switchers," has been a popular mainstay in the desktop line and found additional uses as media- and file-server class devices. A lower-cost iPhone could likely have the effect of leading the industry into producing more mid-priced, higher-quality smartphones -- which could both accelerate the transition from feature phones as well as provide incentive for low-end smartphone users to upgrade a step further up to a better, more capable smartphone without a dramatic change in cost.

A "no-contract" iPhone could also be popular in markets beyond the "developing" economies, though the sometimes-accurate trade paper DigiTimes reports that the low-cost model would launch only in limited markets at first to gauge reaction. It would likely compete head-to-head with Samsung in countries where the Korean phone maker has done well, particularly China, India and Japan. A North American launch could also work for the sizeable prepaid market in the US, and make a desirable budget no-contract option for the holidays, students, international travellers, kids and other demographics.

The report from DigiTimes claims that Apple will produce less than three million units in its first run, suggesting a limited release if true. The JP Morgan analysts believe that Apple could "steal" some 20-25 percent of the mid-price prepaid phone market with their version over the course of a year in a range of devices that is currently dominated by Samsung.


     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 02:27 AM
 
Slow news day?
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 05:08 AM
 
As if Apple would price a new model less than $200, a $350 starting point seems perfect for a lower cost model. That Apple will only produce a few million to start with is BS, this thing will sell much better than the iPhone 5(s), especially with a bigger screen.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 05:23 AM
 
Price it $100 above what people will easily pay, offer it in white, black, red, yellow, pink, and purple, watch people lampoon it the way they lampooned the iPod mini for being too expensive yet, and then see sales take off and completely obliterate most of the worldwide market.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 10:31 AM
 
"obliterate most of the worldwide market"

Yeah right, in your own particular "universe"

Yet the weakening Apple Stock most likely will experience a lift welcomed by investors.

Design wise it will be refreshing to see well executed (J.Ives) colorful devices if the spectrum of colors prediction comes true.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 10:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by Arne_Saknussemm View Post
"obliterate most of the worldwide market"

Yeah right, in your own particular "universe"
You don't actually remember the iPod mini.

We'll see about the worldwide market. As it is, they're growing US market share quite handily, despite not offering a device such as proposed in this story.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 02:05 PM
 
Will Apple do a plastic phone?
Nope. The subsidy phone market messes up this move ... until iPhone dominance in the US slows. Follow the money; Apple gets about $450 per phone. Right now, Apple is expanding contracts with subsidy carriers, not the reverse.
Nope. Apple's strongest instinct and history is to give buyers more reasons to purchase at a premium price. Leaping into the abyss, aka Dell hell, is not in the cards. Tie this into subsidy prices and the Nope gets louder.
Maybe. Apple would need distinctive onboard features that allow it to charge enough to keep decent margins on a plastic phone. Possible, but what? Super security. Fingerprinting. Biometrics. A suite of Apple apps. Passport purchasing. Dunno.
Yep. Wall Street expectations have been reset. This is good. No more is Apple expected to double its sales every week or so. Now it can deploy a cheaper phone with smaller margins without getting creamed. Again.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 4, 2013, 02:24 PM
 
Apple makes the best product they can, positioning it at the high end, and eventually build slightly lower-market alternatives.

They introduced the iPod mini, drying up the mid-level market, and then the iPod shuffle, which actually competed with the bargain-bin market despite being higher-priced.

They've already done that in the past, to great success.

They may not need whiz bang features. It might be enough just to be an iPhone that can withstand Samsung's ludicrous subsidies and sales commissions.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2013, 03:31 PM
 
The J.P.Morgan makes a lot of sense actually. And besides that, earlier rumors too indicate this range (remember the $330 iPhone rumor?)
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2