Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Apple lawyer calls DOJ e-book pricing case 'sinister interference'

Apple lawyer calls DOJ e-book pricing case 'sinister interference'
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 4, 2013, 10:45 AM
 
The Department of Justice's antitrust case against Apple over e-book pricing is "bizarre," said Apple lawyer Orin Snyder yesterday during the case's opening arguments. Snyder went on to call the allegations "sinister interference" based on nebulous evidence, and complain about pre-trial comments by Judge Denise Cote inferring that the DoJ was likely to win.

"When the US government brings a case, many assume it must have merit," Snyder continued. "But even our government is fallible, and sometimes the government just gets it wrong... Apple did not conspire with any publisher individually, collectively or otherwise to raise industry prices... Apple is going to trial because it did nothing wrong... Every single indicator of market health improved after Apple entered the e-book market."

The lawyer claims that the DoJ is trying to "reverse engineer a conspiracy from a market effect," using selective quotes and documents that aren't incriminating when put into the context of a relatively young e-book market with tension over pricing between publishers and Amazon. Apple is specifically accused, however, of conspiring with publishers to force e-book prices up past a $10 standard Amazon used to prefer. Most new high-profile e-books cost closer to $13 or $14.

Snyder's remarks borrow much of the same language Apple CEO Tim Cook used at last week's D11 conference when talking about the case. Cook may have been attempting to stay "on message," since speaking freely could accidentally provide the DoJ with evidence.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2