Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Appeals court breaks up class action in Google book-scanning suit

Appeals court breaks up class action in Google book-scanning suit
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jul 1, 2013, 04:12 PM
 
The Second US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York finally ruled today that the class formed by The Authors Guild against the Google book-scanning program was inappropriately certified by Judge Denny Chin, the judge overseeing the case. The overturning judgement ruled that the certification was made before deciding if the "fair use" defense allows Google to legally display snippets of books it has scanned.

"Putting aside the merits of Google's claim that plaintiffs are not representative of the certified class -- an argument which, in our view, may carry some force -- we believe that the resolution of Google's fair use defense in the first instance will necessarily inform and perhaps moot our analysis of many class certification issues," said the panel about its ruling.

As a result of the ruling, members of The Authors Guild must now sue individually, rather than as a group. The Authors Guild has asked the court to force Google to pay $750 per book it scanned for distribution, claiming that Google's effort does not constitute "fair use" under copyright law. Google believes that the book scanning effort "constitutes fair use by allowing users to identify interesting books and find ways to borrow or buy those books, much like a card catalog for the digital age."

Google has argued for dismissal of the suit on those same "fair use" grounds. A $125 million settlement was reached in March 2011 between Google and The Authors Guild, but was rejected on legal grounds by Judge Chin, despite his saying publicly that he sees tangible benefits to libraries from both the scanning effort and technology developed to scan the books. The judge said that the agreement overreached because it gave Google a "de facto monopoly" to copy books without permission from rights holders, and served to increase its market share in online searches.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jul 2, 2013 at 07:08 AM. )
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 1, 2013, 04:31 PM
 
Gee, what a surprise: the tech company which spends the most on lobbying (Google) gets its case reviewed and probably ultimately dismissed, no matter how much damage it does to authors (which ultimately means damage to readers as well). Their rival, Apple, gets investigated on trumped-up charges over book sales. Move along, nothing to see here.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 1, 2013, 08:57 PM
 
Wholesale theft of content, followed by transfer of that property to unwitting bystanders, to facilitate the selling of ads. That sounds like Fair Use to me. /S
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2