Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Court schedules cross-appeal hearing for Apple v. Google dismissal

Court schedules cross-appeal hearing for Apple v. Google dismissal
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 22, 2013, 07:48 PM
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has scheduled the first cross-appeal hearing in an Apple v. Motorola lawsuit focusing on patent infringement and FRAND licensing. As noted by patent analyst Florian Mueller, attorneys are set to meet on September 11. Judge Richard A. Posner, who presided over the original case, heard arguments from both sides before dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims, forcing the companies to appeal the dismissal decision itself.

Judge Posner had expressed frustration with arguments from both sides, claiming neither company showed proof of material harm from alleged infringement. Attorneys were further accused of misinterpreting orders and failing to calculate appropriate damages for the claims.

Initial decisions appeared to side with Apple, as Judge Posner agreed with many of Apple's interpretations of its touchscreen heuristics patent in the infringement claims against Motorola. The Cupertino-based company later appeared to frustrate the judge, who accused attorneys of "inconsiderate sloppiness" that was "unprofessional and unacceptable."

Microsoft and Intel both filed amicus briefs with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, arguing in support of Apple and calling for part of Posner's earlier ruling, regarding standards-essential patents (SEPs) and FRAND licensing, to be upheld on appeal.

In a follow-up interview with Reuters, Posner argued against the need for software patents and suggested the smartphone industry is already suffering from an overabundance of patents. The rise of Apple's iPhone and Google's Android platform has led to a wide range of lawsuits between competitors. The judge further claimed many of the lawsuits are being used as a competitive tool, making it inappropriate to ban an entire phone based on a patent related to a single minor feature.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2