Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Apple blasts DoJ's proposed settlement terms as 'draconian'

Apple blasts DoJ's proposed settlement terms as 'draconian'
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 2, 2013, 04:16 PM
Apple has lashed out at the Department of Justice's proposed terms for settling the case the latter brought over e-book price fixing. In court documents, Apple calls the terms a "draconian and punitive intrusion" into its business, with penalties "wildly out of proportion to any adjudicated wrongdoing or potential harm."

The DoJ's proposal would "establish a vague new compliance regime - applicable only to Apple - with intrusive oversight lasting for ten years, going far beyond the legal issues in this case, injuring competition and consumers, and violating basic principles of fairness and due process," Apple's lawyers claim. "The resulting cost of this relief - not only in dollars but also lost opportunities for American businesses and consumers - would be vast."

Under the DoJ's suggested terms, Apple would be forced to allow apps to link to other e-book stores such as Amazon and Barnes & Noble. The company appears to be most concerned, however, over possible stipulations for its contract negotiations, since Apple would not only have to cancel existing contracts with the five book publishers implicated in the price fixing, but skip signing new ones for another five years, while also avoiding agreements with providers of music, movies, and TV shows "that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple's competitor retailers may sell that content."

Apple is still pursuing an appeal of the court ruling that backed the DoJ's charges. In today's filing, however, the company says that a "narrower and more modest injunction" that's "carefully tailored" to the ruling should be proposed.
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 2, 2013, 04:46 PM
Messing with a non-monopolist's business model - when the subject of that business model was never part of any violation - is inappropriate for DOJ because the the DOJ punishment itself would be anti-competitive.

I agree the penalty should be "narrowly tailored." A fat fine sounds appropriate and is not anti-competitive.
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 2, 2013, 05:53 PM
I would bet serious money that if Apple appealed this to any judge who had NOT already pronounced judgement ahead of the case actually starting, they'd get a nearly-complete reversal. Apple is absolutely right to refuse this ridiculous and yes, draconian settlement and take their chances with another trial. I have honestly no idea what the DOJ is thinking on this one.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 3, 2013, 12:08 AM
You are speaking of the Department of Justice: Eric Holder, et al. "Laws? We don't need no steenkin' laws!"
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 3, 2013, 02:34 AM

The DOJ is not thinking .... it's been paid by Amazon to take up this case ... and as you can see, not only the verdict, but even the punishment is favorable to Amazon.

Most people quickly forget the influence of lobbying and buying politicians ... it's very cheap and easy. Done in daylight.
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 4, 2013, 02:50 AM
DOJ, I have ZERO interest in buying an Amazon device. I will never buy one.

If I cannot get my content through my preferred channel which is iTunes then I will pirate it.
15" rMBP 2.7 Ghz ,16GB, 768GB SSD, 64GB iPhone 5 S⃣ 128GB iPad Air LTE
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OR, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2013, 11:14 AM
I bet Apple didn't see this coming from their 'friends' in the federal government...
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2