Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Schmidt claims Android 'more secure' than iOS, draws laughter

Schmidt claims Android 'more secure' than iOS, draws laughter
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 03:13 AM
 
In the face of security studies that show that more than 90 percent of new mobile malware is found on the Android platform, Google's Chairman Eric Schmidt raised eyebrows and drew laughter at a Gartner symposium and IT expo by refuting a presenter's statement that the platform has serious security and fragmentation issues, claiming both that Android is "more secure than the iPhone," and that access to Google Play eliminates the issue of Android fragmentation.

Schmidt's remarks are par for the course for the Google chief, who previously predicted that Google TV would dominate the set-top and smart TV market by last summer, claimed developers would flock to the Android platform in 2012, and also dismissed the iPad initially as "just a big iPhone." When asked later to elaborate on his claim that Android is more secure than iOS, Schmidt simply repeated the assertion that "Android is very secure," drawing further audience -- and presenter -- laughter.

According to an FBI study from August, Android accounted for nearly 80 percent of all mobile malware threats -- with Symbian composing almost all the remaining risk -- and saw 92 percent of new threats directed at its platform. In numerous studies, both Apple's iOS and Windows Phone were deemed all but completely free of malware.

Schmidt could be confusing reports from others that iOS has more vulnerabilities than Android -- which hasn't been independently verified -- but accidentally (or deliberately) overlooking the differences. No interactive platform is without vulnerabilities, but the way they can be exploited and are used in real-world threats makes a big difference in user experience.

In the iOS system, vulnerabilities are mostly used to facilitate "jailbreaking," a hack that has become all but extinct in the last two major iOS releases. On Android, vulnerabilities combined with unapproved apps from independent marketplaces means that there is no way to patrol or stop the spread of trojan or malware-infested apps, regardless of whatever efforts Google puts into the security of its official Play store. Android has so many serious security concerns that the Pentagon has only approved its use in conjunction with Samsung-developed Knox, effectively locking out any other vendors.

Schmidt also dismissed claims of Android "fragmentation," saying that "we have an we have an agreement for vendors that you keep the Android stores compatible and that is a great breakthrough for Android." It is unclear what he means by this, as a majority of Android devices in China, for example, have no access to the Play store and do not run standard Android apps or interact with Google services at all. Even in the west, the majority of Android users are running versions two or three major releases back, and are not compatible with the majority of currently-offered Play apps for Android.

It is possible that Schmidt is relying on his company's own recently-altered statistics for Android. Google recently altered its algorithm for calculating OS version share by ignoring users running systems too old to interact with or use Play or its apps.

Because of the obvious gaps in security, Apple's iOS continues to dominate enterprise and business use, gain share from Android in North America and spawn forked versions that limit interaction with other app markets. The iPhone 5s' use of a biometric scanner (Touch ID) and Activation Lock are likely to further strengthen Apple's position in a post-BlackBerry mobile security environment.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 04:04 AM
 
You know, I heard there's an opening up in Redmond. Maybe Eric is just waging a stealth campaign for the Big Job at MS...
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 07:35 AM
 
LOL...it must be tough for him since he's no longer on Apple's Board to get his ideas.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 08:43 AM
 
How he can say something like that with a straight face...
What a minute
HyperNova Software, LLC
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 09:07 AM
 
If you say something with enough conviction and repeat it often enough, people start accepting it, and, after a while, it becomes true enough. Religious sects, political parties, and other groups who depend on ignoring facts have been doing this for centuries.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Celebration, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 09:22 AM
 
He just jumped the shark. No one believes this. Very sad.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 10:14 AM
 
Would love to see the video with the laughter.....anyone know where it is?
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 10:23 AM
 
"Windows phone is free of malware?" I can see that because no one is using it.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hubert, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 11:26 AM
 
Access to the Google Play Store eliminates fragmentation? This is why when I still had my Nexus 7 I had lots of apps that weren't compatible with it? Wow, what a statement.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 12:58 PM
 
Oops! Another Schmidt Stain in Google's undies!
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 02:12 PM
 
FYI...the Android-side of this argument, naturally, is not seeing it the same way, including a complete omission of the malware findings: http://www.androidauthority.com/android-more-secure-than-iphone-281248/
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 02:18 PM
 
And next, Schmidt is going to claim he is smarter and more talented than Jonathon Ive. The man can do either stand up comedy or replace Balmer.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 8, 2013, 05:13 PM
 
These sorts of claims are generally manipulative. Is security a tally of reported malware without taking into account their severity? Is it some sort of number of breaches? Is it technological design? Is it the strategy for dealing with third party code?

Until we can agree upon a definition I think these sorts of claims will always be dubious, no matter who makes them.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2