Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > 'Security reasons' keep Obama from having iPhone

'Security reasons' keep Obama from having iPhone
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 01:12 PM
 
President Barack Obama's administration is likely the most tech savvy the United States has seen, but the Commander in Chief can't rely on the best selling smartphone in the world for personal use. In a summit at the White House today, Obama revealed that he cannot use an iPhone for official business due to "security reasons." The President still uses a BlackBerry in the course of his daily duties, but even that device is quite limited in what it can be used for.

Obama's revelation came in the course of defending the ailing-but-improving healthcare.gov portal for the Affordable Care Act's health insurance exchanges. Obama referenced the iPhone in order to point out the typical monthly cost of such a device in comparison to the monthly cost of a health insurance plan through one of the exchanges.

"Now, for security reasons, I am not allowed to have an iPhone," Obama said to chuckles from the audience. "I don't know what your bills are. I have noticed that [Obama's daughters] Sasha and Malia seem to spend a lot of time on it. My suspicion is that for a lot of you, between your cable bill, your phone bill, you're spending more than a hundred bucks a month. The idea that you wouldn't want to make sure that you've got the health security and financial security that comes with health insurance for less than that price, uh, you guys are smarter than that."



Instead, of an iPhone, Obama relies on a BlackBerry, and the President has had such a device since before he was inaugurated in 2009. Before and after his inauguration, Obama wrestled with the Secret Service over the handheld, with the protection agency holding that the BlackBerry constituted a security risk. It could, perhaps, be used to give away his location if it were hacked. Also, there was the concern that anything the President wrote on the device could be used against the administration in a congressional investigation.

Obama, though, resisted the call to give up his handheld. He eventually won out over the Secret Service, and the President can often be seen pecking away at the device in public and while in transit. The President is able to contact very few people through the device, and only a small list of senior officials and personal friends have access to his personal email address. The White House, according to AFP, says that there are additional encryption devices covering Obama's communications, though they declined to elaborate.

Despite Obama's revelation, Apple's iPhone has gone on to see greater adoption in governmental communications. Earlier this year, the Department of Defense began testing mobile devices, including the iPhone, for use on its secure servers. [Lead image via Getty Images]
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 01:24 PM
 
No wonder the ACA web failure happened. Seems like the Administration is stuck with old legacy thinking.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 02:11 PM
 
Quote: "President Barack Obama's administration is likely the most tech savvy the United States has seen."

You're joking right? It's not just that this administration couldn't create a website for Obamacare. It's that they didn't even know that they'd disastrously failed to do so. You don't have to be 'tech savy' to tell the difference between working and not working. One by one, the illusions of 2008 are fading away.
Author of Untangling Tolkien and Chesterton on War and Peace
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Too F'ing Cold, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 02:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by slapppy View Post
No wonder the ACA web failure happened. Seems like the Administration is stuck with old legacy thinking.
What does the iPhone's lack of security have to do with "legacy thinking", let alone the ACA website?
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 02:52 PM
 
Quote: "President Barack Obama's administration is likely the most tech savvy the United States has seen."

Well that's a low bar. My kids are more tech savy than O. Calvin Coolidge was the most tech savvy president in his day too.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 04:50 PM
 
Are we holding every previous administration to the same high standards of subcontractor accountability, or is this a special privilege we've reserved for the black guy? Because if we are, I've got a bone to pick with Bush2, Clinton, Bush1, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, etc etc etc.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 04:59 PM
 
Totally agree, JackWebb. It is a low bar.

Inkling. The ACA web thing wasn't so much about tech savviness, but more about project management. They fell into some common pitfalls regarding the process, not the technology. Glad the ACA web team got this turned around though. Please don't forget that the private sector fails miserably at launch too.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 06:05 PM
 
Inkling: as a writer, you more than most should understand the definition of words. Of course this administration is the most tech-savvy so far ... as will the next one be. By definition, each new administration is more tech-savvy than the last one.

The Bush Jr. administration was more tech-savvy than the Clinton administration as well. This is just the inevitable result of moving forward in time, as you should know. One (now-fixed) website fubar does not in any way obscure the *incredible* re-organization and updating of the US government's overall web approach, which has actually been one of the most complete re-orgs of publicly-available gov't information in the entire history of the country, bringing a new level of accessibility and transparency to a wealth of information that was previously very difficult or costly to obtain. And of course, Obama's team also leveraged emerging social and internet technologies to help him win office and be re-elected. So quite CLEARLY the description "most tech-savvy" absolutely fits the current administration.

Unless, of course, you already have an agenda against the President and won't give him and his administration credit for anything ...
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: State of WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 06:47 PM
 
Tech savvy...pffffft!

This clown is a failure from the word GO. He's in way over his head.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 09:14 PM
 
Why would a president need a smart phone? Keep a calendar? check on emails? Remind him when to go to the next meeting? Give him a map to get to that meeting? Find out how the traffic is on the way? Get a piece of information off the web?

Why do we spend (I presume) millions of dollars on a white house staff if the president has his own phone? That's what the staff is there for: direct his life, feed him information, provide counsel and direction.

I guarantee you if I had half the hangers-on the president does, my phone would go deep in some drawer somewhere.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 10:42 PM
 
When the private sector fails miserably it either adjusts or goes out of business to be replaced by a better business, unless it's a government protected monopoly.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 5, 2013, 11:47 PM
 
I had some experience with the industry that supports devices for people like the Pres. The issue is that it's a lethargic, slow moving group that takes forever to adapt to anything. (Kind of like govt.!)

There aren't any security issues, they just haven't learned to support anything new, nor do they have the desire to. Hell, the desktop computers in this environment are still running Windows XP.

The newest love affair among the propeller heads in this environment is now Android, and that does have problems with being secured.
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 6, 2013, 08:53 PM
 
JackWebb. I'm not so sure about the "to be replaced by a better business" assertion, but yeah. Largely a mostly accurate generalization, sort of.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 6, 2013, 11:56 PM
 
Originally Posted by mytdave View Post
There aren't any security issues, they just haven't learned to support anything new, nor do they have the desire to. Hell, the desktop computers in this environment are still running Windows XP.

The newest love affair among the propeller heads in this environment is now Android, and that does have problems with being secured.

What is your basis for these claims?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashua NH, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2013, 12:05 AM
 
"Yes! We hacked the presidents cell phone."

"Perfect. Where is he now?"

"In the White House."

"We have him now!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2013, 01:09 AM
 
I bet he uses a fancy bidet. Paid for with our tax dollars, of course.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashua NH, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2013, 01:26 AM
 
The issue isn't really iPhone vs blackberry. It's that he's carrying a radio trasmitter that's constantly transmitting and it's broadcasting its serial number. You could literally make a missile seeker that would home in on it. It's a fundamental thing with how cell phones work. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't actually have a dozen or more phones he randomly switches between.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2