Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > RSA hits out at 'secret NSA contract' reports, claims innocence

RSA hits out at 'secret NSA contract' reports, claims innocence
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 23, 2013, 12:26 PM
 
RSA Security has struck out against claims that the company was paid by the National Security Agency (NSA) to sell flawed encryption software that was vulnerable to surveillance. A blog post states that it has never entered into a "secret contract" with the NSA, and that any collaboration between it and the agency has been openly publicized.

A report by Reuters late last week claimed that RSA was paid $10 million to promote the pseudorandom-number generator, with the payment made in exchange for the crackable generator to be used as the default setting in its Bsafe security tools. Critics pointed at the alleged payment as evidence of potential complacence with government surveillance.

The EMC-owned company asserts that it made the decision to use the algorithm as the default setting in 2004, "in the context of an industry-wide effort to develop newer, stronger methods of encryption." It points out that though it was the default, there were multiple options in the Bsafe toolkit, with users able to select any that best suits their needs. It remained an option as it had been accepted as a NIST standard and of its value in FIPS compliance, with NIST being relied upon when concerns about the algorithm surfaced in 2007. When NIST advised not to use the algorithm in September of this year, it "communicated that recommendation to customers and discussed the change openly in the media."

At the end of the post, RSA states that it never divulges information about its dealing with customers, and has "never entered into any contract or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA's products, or introducing potential 'backdoors' into our products for anyone's use."

The post as a whole certainly attempts to distance RSA from the NSA and the surveillance scandal, though considering the implications of the allegations, this will certainly have dented RSA's standings in the security industry.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 23, 2013, 02:30 PM
 
LOL. RSA's statement could have been written by Bill Clinton himself. Nothing it says contradicts anything Snowden revealed. What a bunch of dirty *******.
( Last edited by Charles Martin; Dec 23, 2013 at 10:16 PM. )
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 23, 2013, 03:36 PM
 
"that it never divulges information about its dealing with customers"

NSA included, of course - if they REALLY had ***** they would reveal everything, leave the US and tell the NSA to **** off.

It's amazing how Americans are able to say absolutely nothing with so many words - also known as the masters of hypocrisy.
( Last edited by Charles Martin; Dec 23, 2013 at 10:16 PM. )
Mac OS X: Because Windows Sucks
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 23, 2013, 10:14 PM
 
GopherAlex -- you misspelled "Dick Cheney" in your post.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2