Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > US Department of Commerce asks ICANN for DNS transition plan

US Department of Commerce asks ICANN for DNS transition plan
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2014, 02:20 PM
The United States government has asked the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to begin drafting a proposal to transition the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's (NTIA) responsibility of domain name system (DNS) administration away from the United States. Stepping away from governance of ICANN would mark the final phase of DNS privatization that had been set in motion in 1998, allowing ICANN to operate independently.

Conditions for the transition proposal must contain "broad community support" and address four outlined principles. The proposal must "support and enhance the multi-stakeholder model; maintain the security, stability and resiliency of the Internet DNS; meet the needs of expectation of the global customer and partners of the IANA services; and, maintain openness of the Internet." The intent of the proposal request is to make ICANN an independent operation free from American monitoring. As such "the NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or inter-governmental organization solution."

"The timing is right to start the transition process. We look forward to ICANN convening stakeholders across the global Internet community to craft an appropriate transition plan," says Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information Lawrence E. Strickling in a statement released from the NTIA.

The US government has come under international fire recently due to the thought that the United States has too much influence on online activities amidst other surveillance and privacy concerns. The Department of Commerce's contract with ICANN is set to expire in September 2015.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Mar 17, 2014 at 05:32 AM. )
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2014, 02:54 PM
Of course, the Dept. of Commerce will have to retain control of the root certificate for DNSSEC, just to make sure it doesn't fall into the wrong hands.
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2014, 03:28 PM
People complain about the US government having too much control over things but my greatest worry is having a corrupt private company take control forcing costs to go up and dictating who can have access. Please don't let someone like Google take it over no matter how much money they offer. The only way to make sure everyone has equal and unrestricted access to DNS names and main servers is to allow it to be multinational and not funded by a large corporation. I don't know if any organization qualifies for this but there is hope. Just because ICANN is already there doesn't mean they will always be there.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2014, 03:47 PM
Yes, give Assad, Putin and Immadinnerjacket control of the Internets. What could go wrong?
Never underestimate the stupidity of people in large groups.
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Too F'ing Cold, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2014, 09:20 PM
Thank the NSA for this.
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 17, 2014, 03:03 AM

You think there's a difference between the U.S. government, after Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama, having control over things, and private companies having control of things? You're an optimist.

Remember: practically everything the NSA does is outsourced to private companies; Snowden was, after all, a contractor, not some kind of government agent. The U.S. government is, and has been for at least a century, a tool of corporate interests.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2