Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Dotcom defense stymied, NZ court rules against evidence disclosure

Dotcom defense stymied, NZ court rules against evidence disclosure
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2014, 08:55 AM
 
The New Zealand Supreme Court has ruled against Internet maven Kim Dotcom, declaring that US prosecutors did not need to pre-disclose evidence against him in a July extradition hearing. The appeals hearing ruled that the lower court was erroneous in its ruling that demanded disclosure of the evidence. A summary of the evidence has already been provided to Dotcom, and is sufficient for defense purposes at this stage, the judges ruled.

Evidence that Dotcom's legal team wants in full are contained on laptops, hard drives, and paper documents seized by New Zealand police in the raid on the Megaupload founder. "We have a much higher hurdle because of today's ruling in getting disclosures, and that will impact the fairness of the [extradition] hearing," Dotcom defense attorney Ira Rothken told Reuters.

Megaupload as a corporate entity was best known for its now-shuttered websites, including the file hosting service megaupload.com. The domain names for the entire company were seized, and the sites associated with Megaupload were shut down by the United States Department of Justice on January 19, 2012, following the indictment and arrests of Dotcom and other owners for allegedly operating as an organization dedicated to copyright infringement.

Dotcom's defense argues that the file locker service was just a file repository for others, and no organized promotion of copyright infringement was made, regardless of data source. The US Department of Justice disagreees, claiming that Dotcom and Megaupload paid bounties to users who uploaded popular content, and deleted infrequently-accessed files. In either case, the judges in New Zealand ruled that for the purposes of an extradition hearing, the full discovery process was not required.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Mar 22, 2014 at 11:03 PM. )
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2