Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Telecommunication providers issue letter to FCC Chairman Wheeler

Telecommunication providers issue letter to FCC Chairman Wheeler
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 13, 2014, 04:40 PM
Senators, Internet companies and citizens aren't the only groups issuing letters to the Federal Communications Commission over proposed changes to net neutrality. CEOs of major telecommunication companies have stepped in, issuing a letter to Chairman Tom Wheeler and the FCC commissioners, asking that changes in policy stay away from the concept of possible reclassification of broadband as public utilities.

In the letter obtained by The Verge, CEOs of companies such as AT&T, Verizon and Time Warner Cable propose that the plan stay outlined as Wheeler initially proposed it, before undergoing the slate of changes that were proposed earlier in the week following scathing criticism. The parties of the letter urge the FCC not to seek reclassification of broadband under Title II, after government regulation was sought out by "a concerted publicity campaign by some advocacy groups."

"As demonstrated repeatedly, the future of the open Internet has nothing to do with Title II regulation, and Title II has nothing to do with the open Internet," says the letter.

According to the letter, these providers already operate their networks in an open manner. Changing the way the Internet is regulated would "impose great costs, allowing unprecedented government micromanagement of all aspects of the Internet economy." Pointed out are the growth and infrastructure improvements that providers have been able to achieve under the current structure, which is currently under threat.

Furthermore, any changes would have an impact on the economy as outlined in the document. Any change under Title II could "stifle innovation and investment in infrastructure, leaving any new features either delayed or never taken into consideration because of regulatory issues. Consumers would face less choice, and a less adaptive and responsive Internet," states the letter. Internet experimentation would come to a close, replaced by entrepreneurs asking for permission from the government in the telcos' scenario.

The group also questions the legal foothold the FCC would have to propose such reclassifications. They point to it being questionable that the commission could even do so, let alone grant itself more regulatory oversight. The Title II announcement in 2010, and previous action of the commission, are laid out to help defend their position. This is in addition to the letter bringing up the idea that the common-carrier approach would bring out " years -- if not decades -- of endless litigation and debate."
( Last edited by NewsPoster; May 14, 2014 at 01:09 PM. )
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 13, 2014, 09:53 PM
I have no choice for Internet. It's Comcast or slow DSL. Competition is a joke. Cable companies are making tons of money and not coming up with anything new. Cellular companies are the same way. If every cell tower was available to every phone people would be very happy but this will never happen.
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2014, 01:54 AM
LOL... demonstrated growth? I suppose of their wallets, but certainly not of choice, price, or speeds. Of course these guys don't want to be regulated. They just want to make a killing, future of the Internet be damned. If it were actually true they need money to expand, they should have used some of the $200B+ we already gave them to do such expansion. The fact that they didn't, kind of proves their actual intentions.

Stifle innovation? No, what's stifling innovation is the lack of competition. This allows them to charge high prices for little services, and keep failing to innovate. This, in turn, keeps the actual content providers on the Internet from innovating. Maybe that's why the telcos have to speed so much on lobbying to try and keep the current status, while dispatching armies of lawyers to use frivolous law suits to keep potential competition from ever getting a start.
Steve Wilkinson
Web designer | Christian apologist
cgWerks | TilledSoil.org
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2