Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > AT&T offers to obey 'open Internet' rules in exchange for DirecTV

AT&T offers to obey 'open Internet' rules in exchange for DirecTV
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2014, 11:05 AM
In an effort to help its bid to buy satellite TV carrier DirecTV, AT&T has now promised to uphold the FCC's previous 2010-era policy on net neutrality for three years following the approval of the merger, "irrespective of whether the FCC re-establishes such protections for other industry participants following the DC Circuit Court of Appeals vacating those rules." The FCC has recently voted to abolish the 2010 "Open Internet" guidelines following the court ruling.

As pointed out by Ars Technica, the pledge is similar to one made by Comcast when it purchased NBC Universal in 2011, wherein it pledged to honor the 2010 guidelines until 2018. Recently, however, Comcast executives have said that the 2010 FCC order doesn't prohibit "fast lanes," effectively nullifying its promise.

AT&T, in making the pledge, is also likely to use its own malleable definition of the 2010 guidelines. It did not specify exactly how it interpreted the order during a conference call with investors, nor in its SEC filing making the pledge. The promise could be an empty sop to the FCC in hopes of getting the deal approved, as the FCC is unlikely to enforce any promises made against a document ruled invalid by a federal court and abandoned by the agency itself. The FCC has now voted in favor of new guidelines that allow for "paid prioritization" deals such as those reluctantly entered into by Netflix to ensure priority delivery by Verizon and Comcast, though public backlash against the idea is continuing during the "public comment" period.
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2014, 02:02 PM
Wow! Three whole years?! How . . . . generous . . .
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2014, 02:27 PM
Yes, we promise not to get out and take advantage of our position for three whole years!! Come on baby, I'll be good to you, I promise...
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2014, 03:11 PM
I would recommend that ATT be required to Support and adopt for all ISPs to be common carrier utility. Then their behavior will be enforced by law.
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2014, 03:50 PM
The big telecoms appear to have plenty of money available for upgrades.

For the amount of money and debt AT&T and Comcast are collectively shelling out for their respective mega-deals, they could deploy super-fast gigabit-fiber broadband service to every single home in America.
- Craig Aaron, FreePress

Instead of merger mania, which delivers no value to the customer (higher bills remove value), telecoms should spend that money on rollouts. Especially into each others' territories. "Comcast and TW not competing in any locations" is not reason for a merger. More like reason for an antitrust investigation. Of why they appear to have a gentleman's agreement to not compete.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2