A new proposal introduced in the US Senate called the "E-Label Act"
would allow electronics manufacturers the option of using "digital" stamps of regulatory approval on devices rather than the physical emblems now required to show that the device has passed required safety and federal inspections. The bill is a bipartisan effort, with a goal of lowering costs for manufacturers as well as allowing further design freedom. It would not remove all such markings, due to the international nature of some of them.
To use a typical example, an iPhone has six markings on the back of the device not required by Apple. Beyond Apple's own etchings, there is an FCC ID number, a IC number (for Industry Canada), and the IMEI number. Below that are logos for (from left to right), the FCC regulatory approval, the European WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive, the European CE mark ("Conformité Européene") and number, and finally a symbol with an exclamation point in a circle.
The latter is an alert from the EU that the iPhone is a "Class II" device and might operate on frequencies that are restricted in certain countries. For example, in France the iPhone is only allowed to use a narrow portion of the 2.4GHz band for cellular communications, but its radio is capable of using other frequencies when it can detect them (such as picking up German networks near the border, where the other frequencies are allowed).
Samsung's markings are behind removable plate
Should the proposed Senate bill become law, the E-Label Act would offer manufacturers the option of removing the physical markings for US agencies and replacing them with "digital stamps" that could be seen on demand on the device's screen. Unless the EU goes along with the sentiment, this would only remove the FCC markings from the back of a device like the iPhone, but would still marginally lower the cost of manufacture. A worldwide switch to digital stamps might make a more significant impact on costs.
The bill, which is sponsored by Senator Deb Fischer (R-Nebraska) and Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) has also found bipartisan support for the idea in the FCC. In a joint statement, Commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel (D) and Michael O'Rielly ®, said that the bill would "lead to more devices and new technologies … designed with innovation in mind rather than regulatory labeling requirements." A statement from the Consumer Electronics Association also applauded the bill as "a common sense approach for the digital age" that would be "cost-effective, in keeping with the consumer electronics industry's important ongoing environmental sustainability efforts and a beneficial and innovative use of today's technology."
While passage of the bill would only be a start at reducing engraving costs for manufacturers, the number of devices affected by the law would be enormous. Currently, all electronic equipment sold in the US and worldwide must bear the regulatory stamps of the various approving agencies. "As manufacturers continue to produce groundbreaking technologies, it only makes sense that federal labeling requirements for these products are updated to further promote innovation and create new opportunities in the digital age," said the Fischer, the Republican sponsor of the bill.