Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > 2Mb or 8Mb cache on hard drive. Does it make much difference?

2Mb or 8Mb cache on hard drive. Does it make much difference?
Thread Tools
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 10:59 AM
 
Hi,

I'm about to buy a firewire external drive for my powerbook. I see some drives have 2mb caches and some 8Mb.

In the real world, and across firwire, will the cache size make any appreciable difference?

Many thanks,

J.
By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out - Richard Dawkins
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 12:26 PM
 
A tiny difference at best.

tooki
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 12:55 PM
 
Thanks,

just what I needed to know.

Cheers,

J.
By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out - Richard Dawkins
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 01:07 PM
 
I actually have a 2MB cache drive and a 8 MB cache drive of the same sizes linked up in a RAID array, and before I did the linking I ran xBench on both drives through the Firewire interface.

I don't have the exact xBench files with me right now, but IIRC there wasn't much difference for the random-access that you might do in normal computing, but there was a measurable (albeit small) difference in linear accesses, like you might do if you were working with large data structures like DV.

My conclusion: Unless you are doing media editing as a full-time job, and doing linear accesses all day, a 2MB cache will probably be sufficient. And two 2MB cache drives configured in a striped RAID array will be faster than a single 8MB drive of twice the size.

(I bought a dual-drive FW enclosure off of E-bay in order to get the RAID array working...)
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 02:39 PM
 
I hadn't considered running raid. I've bought a 120Gb drive and single enclosure. Perhaps 2x60Gb would have been better, but there you go. I'll consider another drive if funds become available.

J.
By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out - Richard Dawkins
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 10, 2003, 07:19 PM
 
Originally posted by Freeflyer:
I hadn't considered running raid. I've bought a 120Gb drive and single enclosure. Perhaps 2x60Gb would have been better, but there you go. I'll consider another drive if funds become available.

J.
2x60 gives you 2x the failure points with minimal performance gain. I wouldn't.
OS X: Where software installation doesn't require wizards with shields.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2