 |
 |
Which DVD-R to buy?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: BROOKLYN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi gang-
Did a couple of searches and didn't find what I was looking for. Maybe someone can help me out. My external CD-R drive died and I am looking to replace it with a multi-format number. Something that handles DVD-R, DVD-RW, CD-R, DVD+R, DVD+RW.
I have been watching dealmac.com and have found a bunch that fall into my $200 price range. This drive will be going into a Firewire Case.
Which one is the best for my buck? The most supported? The fastest.
Should I get a Pioneer DVD-106 or a Sony DW-U10A? They are both around $200.
Or should I get a Panasonic Multi-Drive II for $139?
Any help, even pointing to relevant threads, would be appreciated.
thanks,
g
(Last edited by shatten22; Jul 22, 2003 at 01:55 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Best bang for the buck is the Pioneer DVR-105 if you want 4X DVD-R support. No + support, but Macs aren't big on + anyway.
The Panasonic DVD-Multi II is a killer deal, but max DVD-R burn speeds are 2X. The main benefit is DVD-RAM read/write. (OS X supports HFS+ and FAT32 read/writes like a hard drive with DVD-RAM.) Last time I checked though, you couldn't burn CD-RW through the Finder with this drive though. Only through programs like Toast. I'm not sure, but I think the Finder supports the non-Apple DVR-105 natively for burning.
Anybody else know about the specifics with the DVR-105? There must be a relevant thread around here somewhere.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: BROOKLYN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
The Panasonic DVD-Multi II is a killer deal, but max DVD-R burn speeds are 2X. The main benefit is DVD-RAM read/write..
How fast does a DVD-RAM write to a DVD-RAM disc? Also, even though the Macs don't support the +R, isn't there a rumour out that they will....
Hell, I'll go with the 105 if I'll never need the +R...
g
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: BROOKLYN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can anybody convince me of the benefits of having a +R, +RW capable drive on a Mac?
thanks.
g
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: always on the sunny side
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by shatten22:
Can anybody convince me of the benefits of having a +R, +RW capable drive on a Mac?
thanks.
g
I'd like to hear an answer for that as well.
As far as I can tell, the media for +R is much more abundant than -R. Though you can find a lot of -R media, I just see more +R. I have yet to see any -RW media in any stores. I see +RW all the time.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: BROOKLYN
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: BROOKLYN
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
This an excellent source of information : http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html
Basically, DVD+R is very similar in features to DVD-R. It is just not supported by the DVD association (i forgot what it's called), but is supported by Microsoft and Dell.
Besides that, they're hardly different. DVD-R is generally more compatible with older DVD players than DVD+R. That's really about it.
Go with what works best for the system. In the case of Macs, you'll probably just want to stick with DVD-R.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: RTP, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by vmpaul:
I'd like to hear an answer for that as well.
As far as I can tell, the media for +R is much more abundant than -R. Though you can find a lot of -R media, I just see more +R. I have yet to see any -RW media in any stores. I see +RW all the time.
There does seem to be a lot of +R media out there, and cheaper. I can't imagine that it's actually cheaper to make (anyone know?), so what's up? I wonder if Dell and MS are subsidizing this format and trying to beat -R the old-fashioned Microsoft way. I've never heard a compelling reason for choosing +R and I don't understand why the format even exists. (If I have time, I'll check that link.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|