 |
 |
Is the cinema 20" fast enough for video editing?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
The specs for other displays are lots better, but I know
the apple is highly regarded.
Thanks,
Jarrett
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have the 23" and it's plenty fast. I cut video on it all the time. I mean, you're only talking 29.97 fps. Pretty much any flat panel can handle that. I play games on mine at up to 80 fps with no real problems.
Good luck.
|
 "Pfft. I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see it. And look, there's Magnetbox and Sorny." -HJS
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus  Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Even the crappiest LCD built nowadays is fine for video. We're not in the days of passive-matrix LCDs anymore. Refresh rates really only come into play when you are talking about games, but even then I haven't found any problems playing games on screens that hardcore gamers dismiss.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
So there isnt much ghosting?
I plan to use this from an ati 9700pro on a pc(sorry)
and I see the formac has better specs. But I have heard a mix of
things about formac, some good, some bad.
Thanks
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: L.A., CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by jtbullet:
So there isnt much ghosting?
I plan to use this from an ati 9700pro on a pc(sorry)
and I see the formac has better specs. But I have heard a mix of
things about formac, some good, some bad.
Thanks
They are both good monitors, and would work fine for video editing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
