Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > Bluetooth is not 30 feet ranged!

Bluetooth is not 30 feet ranged!
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2003, 07:52 AM
 
Bluetooth does not have the 30 feet range as advertised. In fact, it's more like 10 feet, and by then the signal is so weak that it drops off. I've had experience with a flat iMac with a D-Link bluetooth adapter as well as a t68i and a 12"PB with built in bluetooth. Ive used Address Book, Romeo and iSync and they all have the same range. About 10 feet (with line of sight!).

How on earth is it possible to get a 30 ft range with Bluetooth?
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2003, 08:03 AM
 
My friends and I have tested the 30 feet, and it worked for us. As a matter of fact, with line of sight we got about 50 feet. Through walls we got apx. 30 ft. It was with the Sony Ericsson T616 World Phone. We have also tested with the keyboard and that was a little less range. Also the computers that we tested with were the RevA. 12 and the 15 Alum.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2003, 08:04 AM
 
Laboratory conditions

The 30 feet, like all manufacturer estimates (battery life, Wi-Fi range, etc), is a theoretical / massaged figure.

I have used some Bluetooth devices where I've got 20 feet of range, while others have been much less. Then again, it is designed as a personal area network protocol, so you shouldn't need more than 10 feet for most of its intended tasks.

HTH.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2003, 08:14 AM
 
actually the conditions were bad for the test. We were testing in a electronics store. So I am sure there was a lot of interferance.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2