 |
 |
Does anything other than iPod work with iTunes?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anyone know of a portable MP3 player that works with iTunes? I am looking for something ultra light for running, and relatively inexpensive.
thanks
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Where Airbus babies hatch
Status:
Online
|
|
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93548
(note that most all other "unsupported" players show up as removable media in the Finder - provided they support the USB mass storage protocol - , so you can easily just drag songs to them from the iTunes window.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you have never used an iPod mini, I strongly recommend checking it out. Picking it up and messing around with it shows that it is way lighter and smaller then expected. Also, I know a few people who have mini's and they use them for jogging/exercising all the time with an armband and have no problem. I have an iPod, so I don't know first hand, but I've used my parents iPod mini for running and it is excellent.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Where Airbus babies hatch
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally posted by brandon420506:
If you have never used an iPod mini, I strongly recommend checking it out. Picking it up and messing around with it shows that it is way lighter and smaller then expected.
mind: if you ever do get to play with an iPod mini for a couple of minutes, you WILL want one.
I'm not sure I have ever encountered anything that was quite as desirable as that little bastard.
I'm serious.
Damn you, Apple!

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Great State of Dementia
Status:
Offline
|
|
[off topic]
hey bee girl! its your brother-in-law here. glad to see you took my advice to post here. I am sure these folks will point you in the right direction. (unless they get into an argument first
[back to topic]
|
|
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93548
(note that most all other "unsupported" players show up as removable media in the Finder - provided they support the USB mass storage protocol - , so you can easily just drag songs to them from the iTunes window.)
Despite what Apple says on that page, none of those players support AAC, even unprotected. You'll be limited to MP3 for those players.
For the longest time the only flash based players that supported AAC were from Panasonic, and the Pamasonic players did not support drag and drop or iTunes. Now I notice these:
Clicky
But checking out user reviews, I haven't found that any of these can support drag and drop or iTunes, meaning NO MAC COMPATIBILITY WHATSOEVER. They all have their own software to manage files.
Plus almost all of those players are either as expensive, or more expensive than the iPod Mini.
Check out the Mini. It's small enough.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
The iPod mini is totally awesome! If it weren't for the small HD capacity, I would have one in my hands right now. It was much smaller than I initially thought, after testing one out in the store. Check it out: http://www.apple.com/ipodmini/
Noah
|
|
Macbook 2.0 Ghz - Black
iPhone 4GB - Fido
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can this many mac nerds be wrong?? (Strictly rhetorical-heehee) I will most likely give in and go for the mini. It just makes the most sense when you consider how much music is in iTunes at home, the drag and drop is so easy to to use - how could I resist? Anyway, seems like someone told me that running with extra weight will just make me stronger... (thanks Ratspittle)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Where Airbus babies hatch
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally posted by tonton:
Despite what Apple says on that page, none of those players support AAC, even unprotected. You'll be limited to MP3 for those players.
For the longest time the only flash based players that supported AAC were from Panasonic, and the Pamasonic players did not support drag and drop or iTunes. Now I notice these:
Clicky
But checking out user reviews, I haven't found that any of these can support drag and drop or iTunes, meaning NO MAC COMPATIBILITY WHATSOEVER. They all have their own software to manage files.
wait:
In order to install MP3 files (or WMA & AAC formats) to the memory card, you have to use the RealONE player to convert it to Panasonic's SD audio format first - a real DRAG. With other MP3 players, you just copy the files directly into the player or memory card and go.
By what stretch of the imagination can these players be considered "mp3 players" if THEY DON'T SUPPORT MP3S?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mountain View, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was just about to post the same thing. When apple has that event with U2 next week, I'm betting they announce (keyword announce, not realease) the 60 gig ipod and the flash based one. However, I don't think these will be available until late November/early December.
BeeGirl- It depends how much music you have or plan on getting. If it is anywhere near 1000 songs, go for the mini, you won't be dissapointed. But if you don't have that much music, it might be benificial and see how the flash based thing pans out.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|