 |
 |
Canoscan feedback?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm considering getting either the Canoscan N650U or N1220U scanner, to go with a G3 Powerbook. I like these models because they're powered off the USB bus and therefore seem much more portable and versatile. Are there any drawbacks to this? Anybody have any feedback on either of these scanners, or know what bundled software they come with? Thanks.
Adham
|
|
12" PB 768MB 80GB AE SD
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've got the N656U, which is exactly like the 650 but with a grey case. I've had no reservations with it at all. It's worked beautifully. People walk in and say, "THAT'S your scanner?", then want me to show them that it actually works.
|
|
17" 1GHz FP iMac OS 10.3.3, 80GB Lacie, 333MHz iMac, 160GB, OS 9.2.2, Epson Perfection 1250, Canoscan N656U, imation Superdisk drive, two Epson i740's, one Canon i450, and a partridge in a pear tree.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island,NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have the CanoScan N122OU and am very pleased with it. The only thing about it being USB powered is that mine requires that it is plugged into either the computer or a powered hub.Other than that very minor issue I only have good things to say about it. The base that is provided that allows you to stand it on its side makes it a real space saver.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: San Diego, California, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Have some software because the stuff that comes with the Canoscan sucks. Hardware is adequate - scanning takes forever compared to SCSI or Firewire. The best thing is that you can yank the plug and store the unit on a bookshelf when you're not using it - Zero desk space requirement!
|
|
iMac 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 6GB, OS 10.6.8
Macbook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 8GB. OS 10.6.8
iPhone 3GS 32GB, OS 5 / TiBook / Newton (2)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Has anyone else any recent feedback on the canoscan n1220u? What is the quality of its scans? Does it exceed my old UMAX Astra 1220s?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've got the N656U and it has been a dream to work with. I was immediately drawn to the super-slim size (looks like a tiBook). Bus-powered is a great feature. I've got no problems with the time it takes to scan whatsoever. It creates top quality scans, it exceeds many larger and more expensive scanners. I'm a graphic designer and I sometimes wish I'd gotten the next level up but the N656U does all I need it to at this point.
Go for it!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Binghamton, New York, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've had a Canoscan 1220U for quite some time and I'm very happy with it. I wish it was faster, but that's the price you pay for going the USB route. There is a new model and it seems to be the same except for the color of the case and more buttons on the front. The 1220U has one button that launches the included Canon software, but I scan directly into photoshop so I never use it. The build quality it good, it doesn't flex or seem poorly assembled. Plus, it really cool to look at, its an excellent match for those who own TiBooks. Well, that's my $.02USD.
|
|
2.3Ghz 17" SandyBridge MBP 8GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|Dell 2408WFP|64GB iPad2 ATT 3G
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Check out the reviews at www.pcworld.com and popular photography (don't have the link for that one).
The Canons use CIS technology, which, all else being equal, is not quite as good as the more conventional CCD technology, but is plenty good enough for non-professional use. If compactness and USB-power are important to you, by all means get a Canon. If speed and accuracy are more important to you, get an Epson.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: bethesda, Md. 20816
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have both the Canon 1220u and the UMax 2200. If there is a difference in quality of scans, I really have not seen it. Like one poster here said, I/we wish it were faster. But, other than that I have not got a single complaint about either of them.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<David>
|
|
I'm thinking about getting a Canon CanoScan N670U.
I have two questions that i'm hoping somone will answer.
1. It is a 600 x 1200 dpi scanner. I know what dpi is but I do not understand what does the order of the numbers mean. For example what would the difference be between 600 x 1200 dpi and 1200 x 600 dpi?
2. Someone said in there post that it requires a powered USB port.
Would an Apple Pro Keyboard's extra port work for this?
Thank you.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: nyc
Status:
Offline
|
|
i just picked up a canon n1220u from www.jandr.com for $79. it is refurbished, but i've been playing with it and it works great. the compact size and usb power make it ideal for my mobile needs (fits right into the side slot of my computer bag). not the fastest or the best, but for the money a nice deal.
note that the website doesn't have the $79 price. you have to call them and tell them you saw the ad in the new york times listing it at $99 minus immediate $20 off. (if you live in nyc metro area they are shipping ups ground at no extra charge (i got mine the next day.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
