Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > 3-2-2 RAM v.s 2-2-2 RAM

3-2-2 RAM v.s 2-2-2 RAM
Thread Tools
madra
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Mar 26, 2001, 10:19 AM
 
i've just added an extra 128MB crucial RAM to my pismo 500. the crucial is 2-2-2 whereas the built in RAM is 3-2-2. while i've no idea what this means, i seem to remember reading elsewhere on the forum that 2-2-2 RAM is faster and/or better. is there a noticeable difference and if so should i swop the 2-2-2 into the top [ie. pre-installed] slot, as this will presumably be the RAM that is used by the OS and doled out to other apps first?

------------------
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 26, 2001, 02:36 PM
 
Search the forums, this has been discussed in easily over 50 threads.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Myers, FL, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 27, 2001, 12:25 AM
 
I just posted this, but again:

222 vs. 322: This refers to the latency speed of the DIMM with 2-2-2 being faster than 3-2-2, 2-2-2 is the fastest, 3-3-3 the slowest. The first number is the CAS Latency, the second number is the RAS to CAS Delay, and the third number is the RAS Precharge Time, with each time being a 2 or a 3. CAS Latency is the latency between the read command and time the data becomes available.?S Precharge Time is the amount of clocks after a precharge command has been issued.?nally, the RAS to CAS Delay is the latency between the active command and the read/write command.t best, the 2-2-2 RAM is slightly faster than the 3-2-2 RAM, and only in RAM intensive applications... in fact the difference may not even be noticeable.

Hope this helps!

Cheers!
Chris
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Green Bay, WI USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2001, 01:59 PM
 
There really is no difference in real world tests. Benchmarks may produce 1-2% speed increases, but nothing to get giddy about. I say, buy the cheaper slower RAM.

------------------
The Mac Information Depot. Why go anywhere else?
Giantmike's Website - Version 5.0
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2