If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I've always wondered this... anyone know? Is it a technical limitation or something to do with standards? I find 1600x1200 is too small for comfortably manipulating text on a 21" display, but 1280x1024 is unnecessarily large... something like 1450x1088 would be ideal....
It's all about the VESA standards. Theoretically, they could do any resolution they want, but a monitor with continuous variable resolution would be incredibly expensive to design and produce...
Top
