Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > Daisychain FW800 and FW400 Question?

Daisychain FW800 and FW400 Question?
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: _-UK-_
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 06:02 AM
 
I have a 12" PB with a FW400 port and a Lacie external HDD with both FW400 and FW800.
The FW400 port on my Lacie got fried by my 'Winblows' box! Leaving me with only FW800 on the HDD. I know the drive is still fine as I've tested on a friends 17" PB.

Would I be able to buy a new Dual connecting HDD, plug the new HDD into my PB via the FW400 port and then Daisychain the new and old drives together through the FW800 ports??

Or would this cause some conflict issues?

Many Thanks
12" PB revB
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 06:12 AM
 
You could always get an adaptor or cable that goes from 9-pin (FW 800) to 6-pin (FW 400). Something like this: Sonnet | FireWire 800 to 400 Adapter, which would plug into the back of your HDD.
MBP 2.4/160/2/256
iMac 2.0/250/1/128
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: _-UK-_
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 06:55 AM
 
Thanks for that!
That seams like it will do the job perfectly for me in the mean time

Would you happen to know if what I wanted to do above is possible?
At some point I’m going to get a second HDD and thought that if I set it up in the way mentioned above I might get better data transfer rates between the 2 drives??
12" PB revB
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 03:08 PM
 
Yep, you can daisy chain FW drives together with both 800 and 400 as you wanted to. However, since the data has to be passed through the bus in your computer, I don't think the data rates will be noticable different no matter whether they are daisychained or not.
MBP 2.4/160/2/256
iMac 2.0/250/1/128
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 06:46 PM
 
I'm thinking that the fastest you'll get is 400 if the traffic has to go through a FW400 device.

How did the Windows box damage the port? ALL firewire cards are supposed to protect both the power and data lines so neither the external device nor the computer's interface are endangered by the other. That's weird.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2006, 07:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter
How did the Windows box damage the port? ALL firewire cards are supposed to protect both the power and data lines so neither the external device nor the computer's interface are endangered by the other. That's weird.
I think you're thinking of USB. Quite a few people have dead/fried FW ports.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: _-UK-_
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 30, 2006, 02:15 AM
 
Thanks for the info chaps much appreciated.

Thanks for that link mduell about the dead FW bus problem (which I’d not thought of) I'll have to do some investigating.
I've also got a iPod that will no longer mount which I assumed the windows box had also blow, but it is now looking like that iPod could have killed the FW Bus on my PC and my MAC
12" PB revB
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 30, 2006, 03:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell
I think you're thinking of USB. Quite a few people have dead/fried FW ports.
Wow! I was just looking at a very early firewire PCI card, and it actually had a circuit breaker on the card. The stuff I've read on the basic specs (not very technical stuff, I'll admit) indicated that there was some level of protection for both the computer and the external device built into the standard. Maybe that was just more optomistic than reality...
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2