 |
 |
Firewire 800 or eSATA External Enclosure for Time Machine
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am stuck trying to decide which external enclosure interface I should go with to backup my MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa) using Time Machine. I’ve narrowed it down between Firewire 800 and eSATA. I know that you can’t boot off eSATA like you can with Firewire, but I don’t need that option since Time Machine doesn’t support a bootable backup. I also know that “theoretically” eSATA is faster than Firewire 800 since there’s no encapsulation. I am only using about 50GB out of my 120GB internal hard drive.
Here are my options:
Fantom GF500Q 500GB Quad interface (USB, Firewire 400, Firewire 800, and eSATA)
Price $150
Fantom G-Force GF500EU 500GB USB and eSATA
Price $105
Rosewill ExpressCard/34 Card
Price $20
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
eSATA is faster, but FireWire is more compatible with existing Macs since none have an eSATA port built-in currently. Of course, if you've got USB 2.0, you have compatibility covered anyway, although FW800 can be reasonably fast without the need for an extra card sticking out the side of your machine.
In the end, it's your call.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Minnesota
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would suggest the 500gb firewire/esata, divide the disk in half, clone your drive to one and use time machine for the other. Being able to boot right away from a crash comes in handy.
|
|
2008 2.8Ghz MacPro w/18gb ram, 24inch iMac(1st Gen),
2008 2Ghz MacBook, 16GB iPod Touch, AppleTv
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Frankly, I don't understand why eSATA wouldn't be able to boot your Mac, unless the ExpressCard to add eSATA support sucks. After all, eSATA is just a different connector type for SATA, which is the same connection your internal hard drive is using. At any rate, though, Intel Macs can boot from USB 2.0. It's very slow, but better than a boot CD in a pinch.
One nice thing I forgot to mention about FireWire 800 is that it is daisy-chainable, unlike eSATA. If you plan to connect more than one external device to your Mac over time, FW800 is more convenient for that. If that's not an issue, you may be most happy with eSATA as long as you can tolerate the ExpressCard always sticking out the side of your machine.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oouston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
eSATA any day, especially if you're going to have more than one drive. Faster, cheaper (cost-neutral with one external drive, eSATA is cheaper with two or more external drives), more reliable, etc.
|
|
Mac update estimates: MacBook Pro 1Q10 (quad core Nehalem [Clarksfield]); MacBook 1Q10 (Arrandale); MacBook Air 1Q10 (Arrandale LV); Mac Pro/Xserve 1Q10 (6 core Westmere, 64+GB RAM); iMac 3Q10 (quad core everywhere); Mac mini 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|