Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > When will Apple put Blu-Ray disc burners into their computers?

When will Apple put Blu-Ray disc burners into their computers?
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2009, 07:36 PM
 
In the PC world, higher end computers come with a Blu-Ray player.

In the TV world, Blu-Ray acceptance is picking up its pace: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/te...ml?_r=1&hp

In the Apple world, still no Blu-Ray.

While I understand that the prices for burners where outrageous for a while, they have come down considerably.

A Blu-Ray burner is the only option if you want to actually see what you shot with an HD camcorder or a DSLR with movie capability.

I think it's high time for apple to put a Blu-Ray burner into its higher end units.

I see there will always be a need to burn CDs. What solution would it be: a new Blu-Ray/CD "Hyper"Drive, or two drives.

And is it really the quarrel with licensing fees that's keeping Apple from finally adapting Blu-Ray?
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2009, 07:59 PM
 
I've been told it's both licencing fees and OS modifications that would be necessary, with the latter being the bigger issue.

Either way, I'll just add an external drive when BR burner prices and BR media prices both drop.

EDIT:

I just checked and media prices have dropped significantly, in the last couple of months. A 10 pack of Sony or Verbatim 4X Blu-ray media goes for about US$30 now. Nice.

Anyone have any recommendations for Blu-ray burners?
(Last edited by Eug; Dec 13, 2009 at 08:05 PM. )
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2009, 08:22 PM
 
With HDDs being so cheap, I don't see the point of Blu-Ray.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2009, 11:40 PM
 
When iTMS stops printing money. Apple has no problem with DRM (FairPlay, HDCP) or licensing fees (DVD CCA).

Originally Posted by Eug View Post
Anyone have any recommendations for Blu-ray burners?
8x write, 4x DL write, 2x rewrite... $150
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 02:24 AM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
With HDDs being so cheap, I don't see the point of Blu-Ray.
Same here. I'm skipping BR because I simply don't need it and of course because I don't want it, that is I don't like the bag of hurt it comes with.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 02:31 AM
 
Blu-Ray is nice to have for an HDTV, but I question its value on computers. The DRM makes it too encumbered to be of much value on computers, especially when there are online video alternatives on your computer. There would not be a problem if they just left it with DVD style minimal DRM. Perhaps one day they'll open the format up a bit and Apple will begrudgingly adopt it. I can see the lack of it being a prominent hole in Apple's video production lineup, but then again Apple seems to be moving away from that market anyway.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Where Airbus babies hatch
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 05:04 AM
 
Quite possibly, never. It's just a data storage format, made useless by DRM.

Apple has started adding SD card slots to their machines. I wonder why?
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 08:32 AM
 
I'm not getting Blu-ray to watch videos on my computer. It's for secondary backup. It's much cheaper and easier to backup 25 GB worth of data on a regular basis and keep the backups offsite with a $3 disc than with a second $60 external drive.

I just keep a book full of DVD discs in a CD album in the cupboard. The problem is now the stuff I want to backup is becoming much more data, usually over 4 GB, and sometimes over 10 GB, so sometimes using DVDs gets to be a little bit of a pain.

Originally Posted by mduell View Post
Thanks, but why specifically that one? The Plextor PX-B320SA is in the same price range, and both seem to get reasonable reviews. Just wondering.
(Last edited by Eug; Dec 14, 2009 at 08:39 AM. )
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 10:52 AM
 
HDDs are cheaper. They also don't die if exposed to sunlight. Why not just buy a couple large HDDs in an external case?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 11:24 AM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
HDDs are cheaper. They also don't die if exposed to sunlight. Why not just buy a couple large HDDs in an external case?
I have several large HDDs in external cases. They are my primary backups. They're very annoying for off-site backups though. I don't like lugging hard drives around.

And last I checked, there is no sunlight in my cupboard.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 12:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
I have several large HDDs in external cases. They are my primary backups. They're very annoying for off-site backups though. I don't like lugging hard drives around.

And last I checked, there is no sunlight in my cupboard.
A tiny 2.5" USB drive doesn't seem that much bigger.

To each his own, I guess.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
 
Actually, what's becoming viable are USB pen drives.

Pretty soon it will be relatively cheap to get 64-128 GB USB pen drives. It will be less annoying to transfer large amounts of data around when fast versions of those things drop to $50 or whatever. I give it 2 years.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 12:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
Thanks, but why specifically that one? The Plextor PX-B320SA is in the same price range, and both seem to get reasonable reviews. Just wondering.
That Plextor can't burn BR... makes it pretty useless, no?
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 01:30 PM
 
Ah I see. The store website I was looking at said it did, but that was mistaken.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2009, 05:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
Actually, what's becoming viable are USB pen drives.

Pretty soon it will be relatively cheap to get 64-128 GB USB pen drives. It will be less annoying to transfer large amounts of data around when fast versions of those things drop to $50 or whatever. I give it 2 years.
I was at some store the other day (Office Depot?) and I saw that they had movies on 4 GB flash drives for $10-15. I thought that was really interesting. Plus, if the movie sucks, then you have an extra flash drive
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 01:20 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
I just checked and media prices have dropped significantly, in the last couple of months. A 10 pack of Sony or Verbatim 4X Blu-ray media goes for about US$30 now. Nice.
Isn't it? Looks like Blu-Ray is vying to get everybody's acceptance.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 01:22 AM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Blu-Ray is nice to have for an HDTV, but I question its value on computers. The DRM makes it too encumbered to be of much value on computers, especially when there are online video alternatives on your computer. There would not be a problem if they just left it with DVD style minimal DRM. Perhaps one day they'll open the format up a bit and Apple will begrudgingly adopt it. I can see the lack of it being a prominent hole in Apple's video production lineup, but then again Apple seems to be moving away from that market anyway.
DRM - I see the problem.

What do you mean by Apple moving away from video production? Do you think people are dropping Final Cut Studio for, let's say, Adobe Premiere?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 01:23 AM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post

Apple has started adding SD card slots to their machines. I wonder why?
Good point.

You can transport an HD movie using an SD card, and no need to burn a disc.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 01:27 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
I'm not getting Blu-ray to watch videos on my computer. It's for secondary backup. It's much cheaper and easier to backup 25 GB worth of data on a regular basis and keep the backups offsite with a $3 disc than with a second $60 external drive.
Honestly, my Blu-Ray interest was primarily the recording of footage shot in HD.

For back-up, and external hard disc drive sounds better to handle: you can update the back-up, which you can't with a burnt disc.

Honestly, for backing up I never used disc. Too much trouble.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 01:29 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post

And last I checked, there is no sunlight in my cupboard.
I like your style of cupboard
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2009, 02:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by Veltliner View Post
DRM - I see the problem.
Yeah, if Blu-Ray had kept minimal, DVD style DRM instead of the draconian crap it imposes, I'm sure Apple would have Blu-Ray, at least on the pro models, by now.

What do you mean by Apple moving away from video production? Do you think people are dropping Final Cut Studio for, let's say, Adobe Premiere?
Not for Adobe Premiere, no. What I meant was that it seems like Apple is reducing its focus on its professional content authoring solutions that it started building in the latter 1990s. Apple is much more focused on trendy electronics and boutique computers than it was before, and I think that the shift in that direction comes at a certain cost. It seems like DVD Studio has been left to languish; if Apple truly were serious about it we would have Blu-Ray support there by now, I think. Also, Shake, which had been a market leader, was allowed to die on the vine and now is officially gone from the lineup completely. Apple seems to think Motion is the replacement for it, but the professionals who relied on Shake don't see it that way. See what I'm driving at?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2009, 08:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
Pretty soon it will be relatively cheap to get 64-128 GB USB pen drives. It will be less annoying to transfer large amounts of data around when fast versions of those things drop to $50 or whatever. I give it 2 years.
Heh. Today I got a package...

I had asked a company I was dealing with to courier a disc to me with some files on it, because they were too big to email. They didn't. They sent me a 2 GB USB flash drive instead. I guess it was just easier for them to do that, and 2 GB drives cost all of $8 these days.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:44 AM
 
Plus with the stick you just copy. There's none of this burning in sessions nonsense that CD/DVDs require. I can't wait till the last optical has been replaced by USB memory.

On a related note. I've never heard of it, so I guess it doesn't exist. But does somebody know for sure if there's anything like a BluRay analog to DVD-RAM?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 06:56 PM
 
I see, the quick flash memory has made blu-ray unnecessary.

Just wonder how long it will take that Blu-Ray will be unnecessary generally.

I mean I barely listen to CDs any more, but play them directly from the hard drive.

As soon as we will be able to download a 1080p video in ten minutes and store it on our hard drives (getting cheaper all the time), nobody will probably buy Blu-Ray discs any more.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 08:27 PM
 
I think Blu-Ray definitely has its place for the average consumer of HD media. Consumers who now have HDTVs don't care about Blu-Ray being a bag of hurt in terms of licensing and DRM restrictions. They want HD quality content in the living room. Blu-Ray offers that in a way that's similar to what consumers have had with DVDs. There are also rich content features found on Blu-Ray that don't get replicated on download services.

Flash memory does not offer the same experience, and I don't see Hollywood shifting to such a distribution scheme unless a seismic shift in their marketing effort were to occur. And while I like iTunes because of my inherent Apple fanboy-ism, it too does not offer the same living room experience unless you're among those who have an AppleTV. Now the PS3 and XBox download services do offer high quality living room entertainment experiences, but of course with the PS3 you have their download service and Blu-Ray.
(Last edited by Big Mac; Dec 17, 2009 at 08:52 PM. )

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 09:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by Simon View Post
I can't wait till the last optical has been replaced by USB memory.
That day will only happen for me when USB memory is as cheap as current DVDs which are about $0.30 USA cents per 4.7 GB disc. I give clients copies of data on DVDs often enough that it's not really financially wise to just give away USB memory cards. $8 is still a lot more than $0.30. If I was only doing it occasionally then $8 is nothing but when you do it often it does add up as an expense.

With the growing size of data files even DVDs are starting to become too small so I was hoping Blu-Ray would come down in prices too. They are currently something like $2.50 per disc which is less than what there were at the beginning but I also get 25 GB per disc. I also would like a write once version of USB memory like I can do with optical discs because I don't want my clients accidentally writing over the data I gave them.
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 09:48 PM
 
While memory is getting cheaper and cheaper, one issue is still that USB cards still require USB electronics and the physical USB port. That will keep the pricing more than optical disc, even if prices decrease significantly. It will be hard even a few years from now for USB flash to compete with 25 GB BD-Rs, the latter of which will be going for under 50¢.

It's no surprise that as memory sizes increase, the USB flash drive prices still have a floor to them. While 2 GB drives are $8, people generally do not bother to sell 1 GB for $4, or 512 MB for $2. After a while, 4 GB will be the new floor.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2009, 12:50 AM
 
I see the key market for Blu-Ray is the home movie experience and the fact that you can physically own a movie.

As for now, the download version is probably not as convincing as paying for a disc.

I just wonder if people will start buying Blu-Rays as wildly as they bought DVDs.

I was never a big buyer of discs. I rent them from Netflix, and few of them get so close to me that I have to own them.

But who knows what faster and faster internet connections will bring us...
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2009, 01:26 AM
 
Originally Posted by Veltliner View Post
But who knows what faster and faster internet connections will bring us...
A high ass bill when they start charging you per GB to download, on top of your download sale/rental?
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2009, 07:30 PM
 
The other problem is that the quality is nowhere near in the same league. HD video downloads simply don't compare to Blu-ray.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 20, 2009, 07:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
The other problem is that the quality is nowhere near in the same league. HD video downloads simply don't compare to Blu-ray.
As for now, it's correct. But it's not necessarily so.

A Blu-Ray tops out at 50 Gb. Once the high speed connections are on par with something like T1 you could download those huge data loads and have the same quality as Blu-Ray.

But I agree: there is a joy in having a physical disc. It took me a while to feel comfortable buying software via download (and not having a disc).
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 20, 2009, 07:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by Veltliner View Post
As for now, it's correct. But it's not necessarily so.

A Blu-Ray tops out at 50 Gb. Once the high speed connections are on par with something like T1 you could download those huge data loads and have the same quality as Blu-Ray.
A T1 is 1.5Mbps.

(50 gigabytes) / (1.5 Mbps) = 3.16049383 days

So you're rationed to 2 movies a week, assuming you do nothing else online.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 20, 2009, 09:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by EndlessMac View Post
That day will only happen for me when USB memory is as cheap as current DVDs which are about $0.30 USA cents per 4.7 GB disc. I give clients copies of data on DVDs often enough that it's not really financially wise to just give away USB memory cards. $8 is still a lot more than $0.30. If I was only doing it occasionally then $8 is nothing but when you do it often it does add up as an expense.
Yeah, it's kind of hard to expect USB drives to replace optical media when they cost an order of magnitude more. Something like SD cards may have a better chance at getting cheap enough, since they at least won't have to have the USB circuitry in there.

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 29, 2009, 08:35 AM
 
One possibility is that, once the price is right for burners and media (everything except the Mac Pro would need a slimline laptop type drive), they are working on versions of iMovie and iDVD to put HD camcorder stuff onto your own Blu-ray discs at the full resolution. Would there be any DRM issues in recording your own stuff to a BR disc?

Look after my manor, or I will bum you, literally, to death.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 29, 2009, 09:53 AM
 
No DRM issues with your own content burned to Blu-Ray, unless it's by your choosing.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2