Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Feedback > Is banning users helpful?

Is banning users helpful? (Page 3)
Thread Tools
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2007
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 12:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by Tiresias View Post
I say that mods should be bannable. It's simple. Each user has an option to blackball a mod. They may only blackball a mod once. Once a mod receives a certain number of blackballs (say, 10, from 10 different users) that mod gets banned.
Don't you mean demoted?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 02:11 PM
 
Originally Posted by Tiresias View Post
I say that mods should be bannable. It's simple. Each user has an option to blackball a mod. They may only blackball a mod once. Once a mod receives a certain number of blackballs (say, 10, from 10 different users) that mod gets banned.
And in 20 minutes all of the mods would be banned. Either by a single member with 10 different nicks or people ganging up on the mods.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 02:16 PM
 
Not that I support the idea, but you could easily dodge that loophole by limiting voting to members of a certain post count or membership length.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 06:49 PM
 
Huh? Was "I Love The Lounge" Kevin or something? Banninated.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 07:32 PM
 
I assumed cash
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 08:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
I assumed cash
From what I hear, Kevin is trying to organize other users to harass the MacNN forum staff now. So we can't automatically just assume Ca$h anymore.

Besides, not one of ILTL's posts was long enough to contain the posting/writing style information to enable us to easily/quickly determine one vs. other.

IP address information would make it much easier, but we mere mortals don't have access to that info.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 08:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man View Post
Besides, not one of ILTL's posts was long enough to contain the posting/writing style information to enable us to easily/quickly determine one vs. other.

I love a good mystery!

One of ILTL's posts used the word "silly". This would circumstantially point to Kevin.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 10:08 PM
 
It will be amusing to see how far Kevin takes his little agenda of Kevinness... I don't understand why people don't catch themselves becoming so emotionally invested in something that is so pointless and non fulfilling. I mean, this is just a forum on the internet, and there are many others. I don't understand what fuels their fire ("their" including Cash) and makes all of this stuff they do worth their while. Then again, neither seemed capable of walking away from a conflict, so maybe this is exactly what is keeping them going.
( Last edited by besson3c; Dec 28, 2007 at 10:16 PM. )
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 10:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man View Post
From what I hear, Kevin is trying to organize other users to harass the MacNN forum staff now. So we can't automatically just assume Ca$h anymore.
Why do you say that - has he contacted you or are you just passing on hearsay.

So far I've not seen or heard anything even remotely true about that.

As for the "I love the Lounge" dude, it seems more likely its ca$h.

AFAIK Kevin and RR are obeying the rules and are staying banned.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 11:24 PM
 
I find subego's statement (implication?) that users were basically powerless to be very interesting. I think it's quite the opposite. We on the staff have a finite amount of time to spread across all the forums, while one user can (and has from time to time) barraged the forums with tripe, spam, porn, idiocy, and drivel. Which not only screws things up for the cooperative and pleasant users, but can put MacNN in a difficult position-even legal trouble. Which comes down to "one bad user can torpedo the whole place." That's power. It takes someone with more than a few screws lose and nothing else to do, but it's possible.

We pretty much agonized on what to do about Kevin and Railroader, because from time to time they went off the handle but seemed to be generally decent folks. When Kevin got his ban, he went ballistic, and tried to threaten us with all sorts of dire (and to some extent doable) consequences. What seemed to be his worst threat turned out to be more of a "ok, see how far it gets you" threat, so we seem to be pretty much clear of his antics. Person Man's point about some sort of organized harassment orchestrated by Kevin has a note of truth in it, and he even registered a new (ban evading) nick that was supposed to sound like one of Ca$h's. Didn't work, and he's gone forever. Railroader, on the other hand, has accepted his ban with grace (which seems to be his style anyway), and when it expires (pretty soon), he'll be welcomed back.

At worst, banning a misbehaving member slows them down enough to get them to think about their actions-we do NOT do it lightly. At best, it's a credible threat that makes mischievous members think twice before intentionally doing things they know they shouldn't. For the most part it works.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Dec 28, 2007, 11:27 PM
 
Just checked, it wasn't Cash or Kevin. A different ban evader. Railroader will be back in 20 days and 0 hours.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 12:58 AM
 
Was it PacHead? KellyHogan? Mojo2?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 01:15 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
We pretty much agonized on what to do about Kevin and Railroader, because from time to time they went off the handle but seemed to be generally decent folks.
I gotta say, gh, that I find you in general one of the most level-headed guys I've met, in person or not. But this snipet doesn't make sense to me -- off the handle is one thing, decent folks is another thing; but neither are things you can really judge in this medium.

Perhaps I'm talking out of my ass, but the only way to really "judge" people here is by what they do, or do not do. The set up here, as elsewhere, is simple: rules are a priori, and you judge whether they are broken or not. Rules. Not the character of the poster behind them, because that's just speculation.

Good thing too, because were I to guess teh character behind those two monikers I doubt I could be very charitable.

Anyway, perhaps not a very useful comment, and a poor way of segueing into something I also feel, namely that you guys don't have an easy row to hoe, and I appreciate your posts and your moderation.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 02:15 AM
 
[EDIT] All removed. Pointless.

I decided it's not worth expressing my opinion when I can't access all of the related information. I could go all anti-establishment with it and accuse the mods of overreacting, but I'm just going to have to trust them on Kevin's perma-ban.

I have to get out of the Feedback lounge quickly. This place creeps me out.
( Last edited by Jawbone54; Dec 29, 2007 at 02:42 AM. )
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 03:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
I find subego's statement (implication?) that users were basically powerless to be very interesting. I think it's quite the opposite. We on the staff have a finite amount of time to spread across all the forums, while one user can (and has from time to time) barraged the forums with tripe, spam, porn, idiocy, and drivel. Which not only screws things up for the cooperative and pleasant users, but can put MacNN in a difficult position-even legal trouble. Which comes down to "one bad user can torpedo the whole place." That's power. It takes someone with more than a few screws lose and nothing else to do, but it's possible.

Torpedo?

When did that happen, ever?

Seriously, I'd be interested in that purely as a student of foradynamics.


Edit: FWIW the above was actually an attempt not to be snarky, but upon reflection I realize it comes off as the opposite. Let me try and rephrase this more directly.

I don't see the ability to make a complete ass of yourself in public as "power", and I'm not sure who you think is holding you responsible for not having taken care of something you have yet to see (i.e. the only situation wherein something that "damages" the forum/experience is allowed to exist).
( Last edited by subego; Dec 29, 2007 at 04:59 AM. )
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 07:53 AM
 
Well, it took only about two or three members to kill the Political Lounge.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 08:05 AM
 
Originally Posted by analogika View Post
Well, it took only about two or three members to kill the Political Lounge.

This begs elaboration.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 09:06 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
I don't see the ability to make a complete ass of yourself in public as "power", and I'm not sure who you think is holding you responsible for not having taken care of something you have yet to see (i.e. the only situation wherein something that "damages" the forum/experience is allowed to exist).
Without writing a "how to destroy MacNN" primer, let me just say that if someone wanted to, they could choose a time when there weren't too many people online and then post damaging, illegal, or otherwise bad materials, then "report the site" to some authority or other. Fortunately this is kind of difficult to do because we have mods in a number of different timezones. But it could be damaging nonetheless, and making an ass of himself would be the least of the user's impacts.

Take for example a recently "self requested ban" user: as discussed above, he "got our attention" not by sending a PM or two, but by posting pictures featuring nudity. His pictures were shall we say "mild," but were still out of bounds, so we had to take action. If these had remained posted for a while, we might have gotten into trouble in certain jurisdictions. Not too far fetched, at least not in our lovely, litigious society.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 10:01 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
If these had remained posted for a while, we might have gotten into trouble in certain jurisdictions. Not too far fetched, at least not in our lovely, litigious society.

I'm working up a response, but I'd like a minor clarification.

How do you consider the length of time something offensive/illegal is on the board as relevant?

I mean, if that time is longer, is that a problem because it allows more opportunity for an unrelated party to see it, take offense, and report you to the authorities?

Or are you looking at this more in terms of the totally insane person who is trying to set you up using the length of time it remained online as evidence of your guilt?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 12:03 PM
 
The length of time an offensive post is visible is directly proportional the the chance someone will see and be offended by it. Completely and utterly-nothing but "potential for offense." And yes, the whack job that wants to hurt MacNN (or any other site) could use this as a weapon. Of course since he is the one that posted it, and we can generally show who it was, that helps in our defense, but why put ourselves in that position?

I do not think that we could be held liable for a user's porn posts, for example, but we could be tied up with legal complications, and that would be expensive.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 11:01 PM
 
Ok, so I tried to figure it out from reading this thread, but somehow I couldn't.

What did Kevin do to earn himself a perma-ban ?

Kill a mod ?
Rape the hampstor ?

-t
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2007, 11:22 PM
 
It's been explained at least two times.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ------>
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 01:08 AM
 
I think said person honked and hissed or something.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 01:36 AM
 
So, I've been thinking a lot about all of this drama and conspiracy and accounting for the fact that I don't know who anybody is, and after putting my thinking cap on for a while I came up with the following:

- Kevin = Rob (I've noticed that Rob isn't here anymore, and Kevin has been suspiciously acting like Rob)

- Kevin = abe (I've noticed that abe has been suspiciously absent too)

- Cody Dawg = Kelly Hogan (nobody seems to know who Cody Dawg is, but I noticed that Kelly is a girl's name, and I know that Cody Dawg was a woman)

- Blue Sky = Dork. (they are both quite pleasant and stay out of trouble)

- abe = PacHead

- ghporter = my old high school principal (always fair as a leader and easy to get along with)

- turtle = not really a turtle

- brassplayersrock = really a slide whistle major

- Chuckit = goMac (always smart about Mac things)

- CATS C.E.O. = also abe, my instincts just tell me this
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 02:34 AM
 
You put together a drama list and I'm not on it?
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 03:18 AM
 
I haven't figured out who you are Lateralus. Who the hell are you anyway? Tell us about yourself, what you like, what you dislike, what you believe in, how tall you are, what you like to eat, whether you can dunk, etc. Until you do, you are just some moderator that calls him or herself Lateralus. For all I know, you could be abe.

In fact, just to be on the safe side, I'm going to go with:

- Lateralus = also abe
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 10:29 AM
 
Originally Posted by Lateralus View Post
You put together a drama list and I'm not on it?
What he said. I’m deeply offended.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 10:48 AM
 
Originally Posted by besson3c View Post
- Cody Dawg = Kelly Hogan (nobody seems to know who Cody Dawg is, but I noticed that Kelly is a girl's name, and I know that Cody Dawg was a woman)
Cody Dawg is ♥, now here in her third incarnation.

     
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 12:08 PM
 
Maybe that should be a sticky someplace — new handles for old users. At least for the ones who don't want anonymity.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 11:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by besson3c View Post
- Cody Dawg = Kelly Hogan (nobody seems to know who Cody Dawg is, but I noticed that Kelly is a girl's name, and I know that Cody Dawg was a woman)
Nope. Kelly can be a boy's name, too. KellyHogan definitely ≠ Cody Dawg.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2007, 11:15 PM
 
Nope. Kelly can be a boy's name, too.
I nearly had a, “Say what?” moment there, until I realised that my own father’s name is Kelly...

<-- at self
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 02:41 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mastrap View Post
Cody Dawg is ♥, now here in her third incarnation.

I KNEW it! And it's out there, for everyone to see. Finally, one less thing Dakar can hold over my head.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 02:51 AM
 
Hey mods, we really need an official mod sponsored/approved "who is who" thread where people can tell us who they are. I feel like I don't know anybody here, and I'm constantly confused into thinking that many people are abe.

P.S. are any mods actually abe?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:21 AM
 
Originally Posted by Laminar View Post
I KNEW it! And it's out there, for everyone to see. Finally, one less thing Dakar can hold over my head.
If this weren't Feedback, I'd make some vulgar remark about what I've left hanging over your head.

BTW, I'm pissed I won't be able to use my "I don't have the heart to ruin her anonymity" line in reference to her. It was gold, Jerry, gold!
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:38 AM
 
If this weren't Feedback, I'd make some vulgar remark about what I've left hanging over your head.
Glad to see I’m not the only one whose mind went there immediately.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:40 AM
 
Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
Glad to see I’m not the only one whose mind went there immediately.
You'll never make Mod at this rate.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:54 AM
 
Well, ‘this rate’ has been my standard rate for three and a half years here, now, so I doubt I was ever going to make Mod, then.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:56 AM
 
You forgot:

besson3c : slightly above-average tuba player

And I can't be BlueSky, because I'm not nearly as cool as he is....

I am opposed to making a who's who thread, because then it would be too easy!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 10:48 AM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
If this weren't Feedback, I'd make some vulgar remark about what I've left hanging over your head.

BTW, I'm pissed I won't be able to use my "I don't have the heart to ruin her anonymity" line in reference to her. It was gold, Jerry, gold!
Your face is gold.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 10:50 AM
 
Too much time in the solarium will do that to you.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 12:54 PM
 
That was "bronze".
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ------>
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 05:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by besson3c View Post

Blue Sky = Dork.
Originally Posted by Dork. View Post

And I can't be BlueSky, because I'm not nearly as cool as he is....
OK folks, after a bit of reflection I'm feeling a little guilty for using my other 'NN account to broadcast how cool I am. I so sorry.
( Last edited by BlueSky; Dec 31, 2007 at 05:56 PM. )
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 05:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by analogika View Post
That was "bronze".
I think it was at least worth a silver. I liked it!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2007, 09:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
If this weren't Feedback, I'd make some vulgar remark about what I've left hanging over your head.

BTW, I'm pissed I won't be able to use my "I don't have the heart to ruin her anonymity" line in reference to her. It was gold, Jerry, gold!
Absolutely cruel. But I'm actually laughing right now. Oh well. Time to go drink.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Jan 1, 2008, 06:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
The length of time an offensive post is visible is directly proportional the the chance someone will see and be offended by it. Completely and utterly-nothing but "potential for offense." And yes, the whack job that wants to hurt MacNN (or any other site) could use this as a weapon. Of course since he is the one that posted it, and we can generally show who it was, that helps in our defense, but why put ourselves in that position?

I do not think that we could be held liable for a user's porn posts, for example, but we could be tied up with legal complications, and that would be expensive.

Has this ever happened?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Jan 1, 2008, 10:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Has this ever happened?
Only at PronNN

-t
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Jan 2, 2008, 01:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Has this ever happened?
Not yet, and of course we work hard to prevent it. But it is theoretically possible for such events to begin and start some legal actions against MacNN. So we work to prevent it.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Jan 8, 2008, 06:32 AM
 
That really irks me. Kevin was a jerk, and liked to cause trouble, but he was here for a really really really long time. And now he's banned, forever and ever and ever?

What the hell? What if he wants to come back a few months from now? He can't? What about a year from now?

Banning in general is stupid. It's effectively silencing someone, which is wrong. Silencing someone who is upset is even more wrong. Unless they are spamming, threatening other members, scamming, or posting porn, I really don't see why anyone should ever be banned.

You just threw out one of the biggest personalities on this place. Congrats. RR is gone, Kevin is gone, Cash is gone.

You seem to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Jan 8, 2008, 11:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by vintage View Post
That really irks me. Kevin was a jerk, and liked to cause trouble, but he was here for a really really really long time. And now he's banned, forever and ever and ever?

What the hell? What if he wants to come back a few months from now? He can't? What about a year from now?

Banning in general is stupid. It's effectively silencing someone, which is wrong. Silencing someone who is upset is even more wrong. Unless they are spamming, threatening other members, scamming, or posting porn, I really don't see why anyone should ever be banned.

You just threw out one of the biggest personalities on this place. Congrats. RR is gone, Kevin is gone, Cash is gone.

You seem to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
For the record, Railroader got a temporary ban which will expire shortly. Kevin did too-and then he went stupidly ballistic and threatened users and staff members, so he bought his permanent ban. Cash never stayed stable long enough to be anything more than a nuisance in my tenure here (almost 7 years). We don't ban regular users (as in non-spammers) lightly. We took a lot of time-probably too much time-to decide that Kevin and Railroader were psyching each other into a froth any time they posted and that they needed to take some time off. When we gave them their temp bans, Railroader took it in an adult manner-he was not at all happy, but he apparently saw that it was best for the entire forum-but Kevin regressed to behavior that I'd class with a 3 year old and that's why he got the permanent ban.

We on the staff are not "of one mind" on much. That's intentional. We were not all recruited because we agreed on anything at all except that the MacNN Forums were important and needed our help to keep them running well. We frequently disagree about a lot of stuff, especially user behavior. One of us may say "User X is being a PITA, and I want to give him a two month ban," and others will chime in with "X is a pain right now, but look at his history; he's obviously having some sort of problem. Let's PM him and tell him to chill out a bit before we think about banning." That sort of thing goes back and forth until we come to a consensus (not an acclamation or necessarily a unanimous decision), and then we act. That's why it took a while to decide that the two users I mentioned previously needed a temporary ban-we had a lot to talk about.

So I'd suggest that you rethink "what if Kevin wants to come back in a few months." If he did, would he be a different person, with a personality that didn't get aggressive and nasty every now and then? We gave him LOTS of chances. He burned them up apparently without thinking about it.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Jan 8, 2008, 01:56 PM
 
vintage: speaking only for my conflicts with Kevin, he also refused to ignore me, which resulted in a lot of strife between us over the course of many many months. I accept full blame and responsibility for my contribution to the problem, but in my defense, I did want to solve the problem.

My point for bringing this up is that the net effect of all of this resulted in a lot of baggage being dragged around from thread to thread, and I wasn't the only one that argued/bickered with him. The bubble eventually burst. Even though I wasn't really a direct part of the final blow that caused him to go ballistic, as ghporter put it, I'm sure I was a part of everything that led up to it.

I don't think there is much you can do about anybody (be it Kevin, Cash, or anybody else) with these sort of burstable bubbles that they refuse to not only maintain, but help stress by provoking and engaging in further conflict.
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2014 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2