 |
 |
Yeay, new stars...
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
I likey 
Freakin' sweet, they change colors all the time 
Let's hope it's not just a hampstor prank...
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yay!
Ooh, and they're always random!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Yes, it's very 
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus  Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trapped in the Mirror Universe!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oooh. I have new stars too.
They don't convey my meanness though.
|
|
MacBook - 2GHz Core 2 Duo / 4GBs of RAM / 250GB / Combo / GMA X3100
Philips 37" 720p / Toshiba HD-A20 / Pioneer HTP-2900 / Pioneer DV-410
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Who's to thank for this ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oouston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
New stars for me too.
Or at least I didn't notice if they changed before y'all's (yow, I've been in Texas too long) changed.
edit: Oh, I just passed 10k posts; that would explain it.
|
|
Mac update estimates: MacBook Pro 2Q09 or 3Q09; MacBook 2Q09 or 3Q09; MacBook Air 2Q09 or 3Q09; Mac Pro/Xserve 1Q09 (2.93-3.33+Ghz Nehalem, 48+GB RAM); iMac 1Q09 (Cantiga, 2.53-3.06Ghz Penryn [quad possible], 8GB RAM); Mac mini 4Q08 (2.1-2.4Ghz Penryn, 4GB RAM).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator  Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Online
|
|
New admin messing around. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50 
New admin messing around.
Thanks, reader50.
Nice creative touch on insanity
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Blame it on the new guy
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
Blame it on the new guy
Isn't that what you get them for ? 
Along that same thought: How about a new hampstor ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trapped in the Mirror Universe!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why fix what isn't quite dead yet?
|
|
MacBook - 2GHz Core 2 Duo / 4GBs of RAM / 250GB / Combo / GMA X3100
Philips 37" 720p / Toshiba HD-A20 / Pioneer HTP-2900 / Pioneer DV-410
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Why fix what isn't quite dead yet?
I like it.
I'm gonna make that my standard, "Why fix it if it ain't dead ?"
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sweet. I like it too.
Where do I find the thresholds for star labels again?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Online
|
|
Those were posted in the beta forum. But I had to fiddle the top two a bit.
The random stars were originally created for Cipher13 when he hit 10K. Then that script was lost in a board upgrade. So I wrote a new one from scratch. Yesterday, "Clinically Insane" was at 15K with the angle-stars.
Trouble is, Cipher has been slacking on the posting - he's only got 11K and change. So I reset Clinically Insane to 11K posts, and dropped Posting Junkie from 10K to 8K. Those thresholds may get fiddled back up to where they were, if Cipher will get on the ball.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Ah, that explains. I was wondering why I got the same stars as other that had already hit 15k.
But couldn't you give Cipher13 custom colored stars, and stick to the old ranges ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Online
|
|
That's a sensible answer, but it will cost you your random stars. Well, for a few more weeks anyway.
If the random-stars are reset to 15K, only besson3c will show them today. Four other people are high enough, but two are on staff and two are banned.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
To be honest, loosing them wouldn't be fun, but I think we should keep 15k as random stars for Clinically Insane level.
You could, however, merge my what_the_heck account (banninated under the unwritten "no 2 accounts rule") with my turtle777 account, then I'd be past 15k.
( Yeah, I know, in my dreams )
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Online
|
|
These are the users who could be affected if the Insane threshold went up.
16,525 - besson3c (safe)
14,496 - Millennium (inactive)
14,013 - turtle777
13,620 - SimeyTheLimey
12,908 - voodoo
12,220 - olePigeon
12,141 - starman
11,534 - mitchell_pgh
11,352 - Cipher13
11,136 - Eug
Posting Junkie is back to 10K, I wasn't happy with the lower level anyway. But I'd like to hear from the other 6 active people on the list before taking the new toy away.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
To be honest, I don't think this should be a matter of what the individuals want.
You mods and admins need to decide what's best, and then just do it.
Blame the temporary change on the hampstor and delete this thread, so all traces are gone
-t
|
|
| | | |
