 |
 |
Yeay, new stars...
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
I likey
Freakin' sweet, they change colors all the time
Let's hope it's not just a hampstor prank...
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Online
|
|
Yay!
Ooh, and they're always random!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Yes, it's very
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trapped in the Mirror Universe!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oooh. I have new stars too.
They don't convey my meanness though.
|
|
MacBook - 2GHz Core 2 Duo / 4GBs of RAM / 250GB / Combo / GMA X3100
Philips 37" 720p / Toshiba HD-A20 / Pioneer HTP-2900 / Pioneer DV-410
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Who's to thank for this ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oouston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
New stars for me too.
Or at least I didn't notice if they changed before y'all's (yow, I've been in Texas too long) changed.
edit: Oh, I just passed 10k posts; that would explain it.
|
|
Mac update estimates: MacBook Pro 4Q09 (quad core Nehalem [Clarksfield]); MacBook 4Q09 (Arrandale if they want to keep common arch with MBP, or just faster Penryn); MacBook Air 1Q10 (Arrandale LV); Mac Pro/Xserve 1Q10 (6 core Westmere [Gulftown], 64+GB RAM); iMac 1Q10 (quad core Nehalem [Clarksfield]); Mac mini 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
New admin messing around. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
New admin messing around.
Thanks, reader50.
Nice creative touch on insanity
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Online
|
|
Blame it on the new guy 
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
Blame it on the new guy
Isn't that what you get them for ?
Along that same thought: How about a new hampstor ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trapped in the Mirror Universe!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why fix what isn't quite dead yet?
|
|
MacBook - 2GHz Core 2 Duo / 4GBs of RAM / 250GB / Combo / GMA X3100
Philips 37" 720p / Toshiba HD-A20 / Pioneer HTP-2900 / Pioneer DV-410
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Why fix what isn't quite dead yet?
I like it.
I'm gonna make that my standard, "Why fix it if it ain't dead ?"
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sweet. I like it too.
Where do I find the thresholds for star labels again?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Those were posted in the beta forum. But I had to fiddle the top two a bit.
The random stars were originally created for Cipher13 when he hit 10K. Then that script was lost in a board upgrade. So I wrote a new one from scratch. Yesterday, "Clinically Insane" was at 15K with the angle-stars.
Trouble is, Cipher has been slacking on the posting - he's only got 11K and change. So I reset Clinically Insane to 11K posts, and dropped Posting Junkie from 10K to 8K. Those thresholds may get fiddled back up to where they were, if Cipher will get on the ball.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Ah, that explains. I was wondering why I got the same stars as other that had already hit 15k.
But couldn't you give Cipher13 custom colored stars, and stick to the old ranges ?
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's a sensible answer, but it will cost you your random stars. Well, for a few more weeks anyway.
If the random-stars are reset to 15K, only besson3c will show them today. Four other people are high enough, but two are on staff and two are banned.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
To be honest, loosing them wouldn't be fun, but I think we should keep 15k as random stars for Clinically Insane level.
You could, however, merge my what_the_heck account (banninated under the unwritten "no 2 accounts rule") with my turtle777 account, then I'd be past 15k.
( Yeah, I know, in my dreams  )
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
These are the users who could be affected if the Insane threshold went up.
16,525 - besson3c (safe)
14,496 - Millennium (inactive)
14,013 - turtle777
13,620 - SimeyTheLimey
12,908 - voodoo
12,220 - olePigeon
12,141 - starman
11,534 - mitchell_pgh
11,352 - Cipher13
11,136 - Eug
Posting Junkie is back to 10K, I wasn't happy with the lower level anyway. But I'd like to hear from the other 6 active people on the list before taking the new toy away.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
To be honest, I don't think this should be a matter of what the individuals want.
You mods and admins need to decide what's best, and then just do it.
Blame the temporary change on the hampstor and delete this thread, so all traces are gone
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
To be honest, I don't think this should be a matter of what turtle777 wants.
Advice accepted. I'll take your opinion on Rank settings under advisement.
And no thread deletes.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: FL Cape
Status:
Offline
|
|
You all post too much. You should all be clinically insane.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Teronzhul
You all post too much. You should all be clinically insane.
Huh ?
I all are
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
These are the users who could be affected if the Insane threshold went up.
16,525 - besson3c (safe)
14,496 - Millennium (inactive)
14,013 - turtle777
13,620 - SimeyTheLimey
12,908 - voodoo
12,220 - olePigeon
12,141 - starman
11,534 - mitchell_pgh
11,352 - Cipher13
11,136 - Eug
Posting Junkie is back to 10K, I wasn't happy with the lower level anyway. But I'd like to hear from the other 6 active people on the list before taking the new toy away.
That is very very interesting.. only Millennium is inactive of the above..
Like the new stars though, reader50 and I agree that clinically insane level should be centered on cipher13, so no one is clinically insane if he isn't 
|

“Building Better Worlds”
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not too happy that the clinically insane stars mixes with the other star design (yellow). Very schizophrenic. Yes, insane, but also a bit distracting having subtly different star designs mix.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I do like my stars now though.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Glad you took the time to getting to know the star's insanity.
You seem to be a natural
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
new hampstor! Yeah... hampstor!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Online
|
|
I have 12,142 posts. Everything should reflect off that 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
These are the users who could be affected if the Insane threshold went up.
16,525 - besson3c (safe)
14,496 - Millennium (inactive)
14,013 - turtle777
13,620 - SimeyTheLimey
12,908 - voodoo
12,220 - olePigeon
12,141 - starman
11,534 - mitchell_pgh
11,352 - Cipher13
11,136 - Eug
Posting Junkie is back to 10K, I wasn't happy with the lower level anyway. But I'd like to hear from the other 6 active people on the list before taking the new toy away.
Ha. I barely made the cutoff.  I like the stars, but I wouldn't mind being an average junkie either. 15000 (or even 20000) does seem more appropriate though, assuming 10000 is the other threshold.
Originally Posted by Weyland-Yutani
Like the new stars though, reader50 and I agree that clinically insane level should be centered on cipher13, so no one is clinically insane if he isn't
Heh. They could have a floating level, based on cipher's level...
That would actually make me sane!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
I don't see how cipher's historic achievement should be MORE of a benchmark than Kevin's.
Maybe, Clinically Insane should be at 18,752 (Kevin) or 30,485 (Zimphire).
Now THAT's insane
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
How about 11000 and more than 5 posts per day? I'm at 11000+ but only 4.1 per day.  j/k
P.S. What does this mean?

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Macbook mid 2007: 2Gb Ram, Intel core 2 duo, 2.16GHz, 160Gb HDD, Leopard 10.5.2
Dell 2007WFP
iPod 5G 80GB
iPod Mini 4GB (Blue)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Online
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Online
|
|
Honestly, if you want to bump it to 15k, it's fine by me. I don't hang out here for the post count.
EDIT: 20k seems excessive for the next level, considering how long it takes to get even 5k. I've been here 8 years and just barely broke 12k. Another 10k would be what....6 years on average for us in the top 10?
I say grow the list with the community. Do a 15k "Clinically Insane" and a 20k secret one now. Once people start breaking 20k, make a 25k.
(Last edited by starman; May 19, 2008 at 02:02 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Why do you care?
Status:
Offline
|
|
I posting to see what my stars look like. Carry on....
EDIT: 2,076 (0.90 posts per day) -- cool, I have a life.
|
|
20" 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac --- just upgraded
17" 2.16 GHz Intel Core Duo MacBookPro --- soon to be upgraded
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Hm, life, stars, life, stars, life stars, which should I pick ?
Ah, I can't decide. I'll take both. Thank you very much.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Why do you care?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Hm, life, stars, life, stars, life stars, which should I pick ?
Ah, I can't decide. I'll take both. Thank you very much.
-t
Oh come on, I'm joking. 5.57 posts/day doesn't take much time I'm sure. 
|
|
20" 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac --- just upgraded
17" 2.16 GHz Intel Core Duo MacBookPro --- soon to be upgraded
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmm. I've been away for the longest time and still am averaging 6.19 posts a day.
|

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
how far am I from 10k?
6855, really far. ohwell.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
zomg, rickey is still here.
|

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What's more, he's still using the same name.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Wow, I guess I never saw it from the perspective of people who don't matter."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by rickey939
Nice balls, eh?
How do you know, I haven't posted any pics ?!?!
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
hehehe... Turtle... Hampstor balls!!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Randman
zomg, rickey is still here.
Why wouldn't I be? This place is my 4th and 5th home away from home.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
What's more, he's still using the same name.
That will never change.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by rickey939
That will never change.
Tis true. He changes his balls more often than his nick
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Tis true. He changes his balls more often than his nick
-t
I have no idea what that means actually, but I agree.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WI, United States
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
16,525 - besson3c (safe)
14,496 - Millennium (inactive)
14,013 - turtle777
13,620 - SimeyTheLimey
12,908 - voodoo
12,220 - olePigeon
12,141 - starman
11,534 - mitchell_pgh
11,352 - Cipher13
11,136 - Eug
$h!†!
I've got a lot of posting to do before I join those ranks...
|
|
12" iBook G4 / Tiger 10.4.11 / 1.2 GHz PowerPC G4 / 512 MB RAM / 30 GB HD / 32 MB Radeon 9200
22" WS / Vista Home Premium SP1 32-Bit / 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad / 3 GB RAM / 500 GB HD / 512 MB Radeon HD 4850
iPod touch 2G / Version 3.0 / 8 GB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|