Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Feedback > Moderator Empowerment

Moderator Empowerment
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2013, 04:44 PM
 
I've tossed this out before, but it was long enough ago I think it's worth revisiting.

I've always tried to move for more transparency* between the moderators and the users. One of the reasons I believe this has encountered resistance is, very simply, users can be tenacious pricks, and the mods don't want to open themselves up to it.

I trust the group here. Let's not even discuss the transparency part. If I'm right, that will start to happen naturally. Let's focus on the prick part.

What I propose is a set of rules which accomplish the following:

If, during a discussion of a moderator call, a user shows even slight disrespect, they will get sanctioned. Period.

This places an onus on users to take the time to calm down and communicate clearly. I think the moderators here deserve that. Even people who have a beef with one or two moderators I'd bet think all the others deserve that.

I've seen some successful implementations of this, so I can give you a nuts and bolts setup of what those rules should actually be. I let everyone shoot the idea down first before I start boring everybody.

More.


*There isn't anything opaque that's happened recently prompting this BTW.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 02:59 PM
 
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 03:05 PM
 
The idea has merit, and may put a stop to the quite nasty emails some mods get after doing their jobs.

The downside, is that users may think we are gone power mad.
     
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 03:10 PM
 
The alternative is you could start a tumblr and posts the emails anonymously.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 03:16 PM
 
Originally Posted by andi*pandi View Post
The idea has merit, and may put a stop to the quite nasty emails some mods get after doing their jobs.

The downside, is that users may think we are gone power mad.
Anyone who sends you a nasty PM already thinks that, I'd reckon.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 03:20 PM
 
Also, if someone sends Andi or Glenn a nasty PM, they can get sanctioned and we'll go beat them up.
     
Managing Editor
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 04:08 PM
 
Speaking as a lowly writer, I'm good with this. The first-poster I changed the ALL CAPS on ANALyst got really pissy with me.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2013, 04:45 PM
 
Once I was asked to tidy up my language. I kind of like to push it, and crossed the line on one.

After dealing with it, I got a thank you PM.

Maybe I was reading too much into it, but I really felt the implication a user just following an order with no backtalk was something of an unusual situation.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Muncietucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 09:49 AM
 
You'd be amazed.
     
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 10:01 AM
 
I like to enlighten every moderator as to the marital status of his parents at birth after every infraction.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Muncietucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 10:28 AM
 
Parents? You are obviously unaware of the Nucleic-Enzyme Vat Process for Moderator creation.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 03:05 PM
 
I did your vat last night.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 03:13 PM
 
infracted: personal attack.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2013, 08:20 PM
 
I understand what you're saying, subego, but really, I think things work just fine around here. I think your suggestion has merit, but the people who cause trouble here will only see the results as moderators lording over poor helpless users.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2013, 08:11 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
I like to enlighten every moderator as to the marital status of his parents at birth after every infraction.
ebuddy
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2013, 08:16 AM
 
This sounds like a solution looking for a problem to me. If there are abusive PMs or the like (unless they reach a tone that would be cause for turning them over to legal authority), it's a matter of simply deleting them and/or not responding to them.

Otherwise, I don't think mods are obligated to explain the reasons for infractions and users are not obligated to appreciate them.
ebuddy
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2013, 02:37 PM
 
Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post
This sounds like a solution looking for a problem to me. If there are abusive PMs or the like (unless they reach a tone that would be cause for turning them over to legal authority), it's a matter of simply deleting them and/or not responding to them.
By this logic we should toss out all rules against personal attacks, unless they reach a tone which would be cause for turning then over to a legal authority.

Or do I misunderstand you?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2013, 07:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
By this logic we should toss out all rules against personal attacks, unless they reach a tone which would be cause for turning then over to a legal authority.

Or do I misunderstand you?
I'm saying simply that I don't see the mods lacking in empowerment such that some additional action is necessary.
ebuddy
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 27, 2013, 12:06 PM
 
When you say "see", do you mean that literally?

I ask because don't you spend most of your time in the PWL? That's pretty hands-off in there. What exercise of power are you seeing exactly?
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 02:40 AM
 
I don't want to be the type of mod who infracts people for disagreeing with him in a heated debate. I think we've shown a reasonable degree of freedom in the past, explaining our actions when needed and accepting that some people will still disagree with our decision.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 03:52 AM
 
Well, isn't it poor form in general for a mod to mod their own discussion?

Likewise, there's a spread of options before infraction. Warning, threadban, etc.

If someone busts through both those backstops, sounds like they need an infraction.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 06:15 AM
 
Just want to throw out there, I've taken a shot at a mod during one of those heated discussions.

The result was the mod bailed from the thread. That helped no one. I would have much rather gotten dinged for that.
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 07:09 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Well, isn't it poor form in general for a mod to mod their own discussion?
That depends on the situation, but in almost all situations I've seen, my colleagues and I are able to keep these two things separate. We mostly try to avoid it because it may look like a staffer is abusing his power even though that is not what has happened.
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Likewise, there's a spread of options before infraction. Warning, threadban, etc.
Most members don't even understand the purpose/concept of warnings (among other things to show to fellow mods that something has been taken care of), so I don't think introducing more elements to the discussion is going to help transparency. Besides, only a small group of people has received infractions/warnings.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 02:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Most members don't even understand the purpose/concept of warnings (among other things to show to fellow mods that something has been taken care of), so I don't think introducing more elements to the discussion is going to help transparency. Besides, only a small group of people has received infractions/warnings.
You completely lost me here.

Adding more elements to the discussion is precisely what transparency is about, no?
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 03:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
That depends on the situation, but in almost all situations I've seen, my colleagues and I are able to keep these two things separate. We mostly try to avoid it because it may look like a staffer is abusing his power even though that is not what has happened.
Well, that's why I used the phrase "poor form". I trust you too, but it looks bad, so you don't do it.

Part of the reason I trust you is because you see maintaining such formalities have value.
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2013, 10:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
You completely lost me here.

Adding more elements to the discussion is precisely what transparency is about, no?
Simplicity of a system can aid its transparency. Plus, we only need to actively mod a very small group of people (who admittedly post a lot), so I don't think we need the additional complexity. And it won't help when people actually disagree with your decision to infract/reprimand them (any sort of reasoning usually doesn't help).
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2013, 03:21 PM
 
I'm still lost here.

I'm proposing a means by which moderators catch less shit in the execution of their duties. Most of what you're discussing seems to be going beyond that.

The issue you brought up with this is the unseemliness of dinging people you're in a discussion with. We both agree this is bad. Is there another issue you have with the general idea of "thou shalt not diss a mod when discussing a mod call"?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2013, 06:48 PM
 
subego has been arguing with Mods a lot in this thread. The new rules should apply here first, and enough is enough.

Checkout time.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2013, 05:26 AM
 
Have I been threadbanned?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2013, 05:32 AM
 
vB3 doesn't have threadbans.

tolerance is a virtue. the proposed rule ... is not very virtuous.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2013, 06:00 AM
 
You can call such things into being by sheer force of will.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2