Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

mattyd · Feb 14, 2002, 01:04 PM

and isn't it possible that apple's multimedia platform could benefit from a name change? has such a weird, cryptic, non-user oriented name help back more widespread adoption?

i mean as a longtime mac user, i'm accustomed to the name and i understand what it does. but as apple tries to capture more market share, i could see how newbies would be like, "quick WHAT? what's that for?"

for instance... windows MEDIA PLAYER... leaves zero doubt as to what it does. now i understand that quicktime is much more than its player, but the average user doesn't. nor do they care.

anyone else hear what i'm saying?

jcarr · Feb 14, 2002, 01:28 PM

It's better than 'Andy Warhol' (the codename for the QuickTime project).

Seriously though, the new idea with QuickTime was time-based media (i.e. movies & sound), and (at the time) it fit in with other Apple technologies (e.g. QuickDraw).

Demonhood · Feb 14, 2002, 01:55 PM

the name doesn't really matter anymore. when i see the word "QuickTime" i think video, plain and simple. i see the little blue Q icon in my head. when others hear the word, i'm sure they think of video, apple, movies, maybe even music. people see it in the trailers hosted on apple (great publicity for Apple, btw), they hear their mac buddies talk about it, and they probably have it installed on their machine, even if they're using windows.

that said, i have no idea why they named it that. Q words are cool? altho i could just be a subset of "moving pictures". time + change = motion. that sort of thing. i like it. "media player" and "internet explorer" always seemed pretty generic to me. i know the app is called Movie Player, but there's no reason the technology has to have a boring name.

mitchell_pgh · Feb 14, 2002, 04:55 PM

They do call it the Quicktime Player when it's downloaded... It's a start.

I'm with you, I guess they should have called it the Apple Media Player (AMP) but that time has come and gone...

Mediaman_12 · Feb 14, 2002, 05:34 PM

You have to remember that there wasn't any real sort of 'Media' to 'Play' when QT was originally developed (back when they put it's little rainbow clock sticker on my new Color Classic).
IMO. I wish they had the forethought to develop it's streaming from the start (or at least very early on) on both Windows & and the Mac, thus saving us from the hell that is RealPlayer.
Real is only big now because it was 1st, it sucks on every platform

NeoMac · Feb 14, 2002, 06:53 PM

Have you been living under a rock?

QuickTime 6 is going to destroy Real Player. A year from now, MSFT and Real are gonna be crying 'mama' - well, I hope.

starman · Feb 15, 2002, 11:33 AM

I'll have to check the alpha and beta CDs, but I think QuickTIME is to A/V what QucikDRAW was to static images.

Mike

mitchell_pgh · Feb 15, 2002, 12:13 PM

Mediaman_12 You are on the mark, Real does suck on every platform. Everything about Real is bad. When I go to a site that has Real I just roll my eyes...

saxman · Feb 16, 2002, 08:05 PM

Hi all

Time because all types of media are reliant on it (video, music whatever) and Quick because that what Mac's have always been................

Jansar · Feb 16, 2002, 09:52 PM

Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
<STRONG>Mediaman_12 You are on the mark, Real does suck on every platform. Everything about Real is bad. When I go to a site that has Real I just roll my eyes...</STRONG>

God, I hate RealPlayer. What a waste of programming time!

rob5243 · Feb 17, 2002, 07:10 PM

Yeah real sucks. Wouldn't it be great if the majority of streaming content on the web was in quicktime? i can't even view realplayer files without going into classic.

Archangel · Feb 17, 2002, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by Mediaman_12:
<STRONG>
Real is only big now because it was 1st, it sucks on every platform</STRONG>

Ditto. On my Win2k PC, it worked fine for awhile. Then one time I went to use it, and it didn't work. Period. I did nothing to it's settings in the intermittent time. In fact, I think the only I was using my PC for at the time was Counterstrike. I've only installed Realplayer on my iBook to use in dire emergencies. I think I've used it twice in the span of a year.

MountainMac · Feb 19, 2002, 10:17 PM

I'm glad to see so much anger in the world directed at Real. I always thought it was something that I did to make it not work; turns out that RealPlayer flat-out sucks. Not to mention it's more insidious than the AIDS virus....

kidtexas · Feb 19, 2002, 11:41 PM

At least it isn't called iTime... or iMovie - oh shit, we already have that.

Is it just me or does Apple have a serious problem in coming up with original names sometimes? A couple years ago everything was Quick____, now it is i____ or Power____.

moreno · Feb 20, 2002, 11:38 PM

Long live to Quicktime! :-)