Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Classic Macs and Mac OS > HFS and HFS+ Networking- possible?

HFS and HFS+ Networking- possible?
Thread Tools
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2002, 05:52 PM
 
I'll be setting up a friend's new (old) 333 grape iMac next week, and installing a new 40gb hard drive. I'll partition with two 4gb slices for OS 9 and OSX, and the rest will be the third slice. I'm formatting in HFS+ to allow for a future upgrade to OSX (not planned at this time) but an concerned with the ability to network with her old Performa which is probably in HFS. Will the HFS+ iMac be able to "see" and get files from the Performa via a crossover cable? That's the direction files will be transferred to clean off the Performa before it goes to her parents.

Thanks.

Val
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2002, 06:13 PM
 
Volume format (HFS or HFS+) is irrelevant on any volume shared via file sharing. it's always the local machine the disk is attached to that handles file reads and writes and therefore that's the only system that cares.

When using something like FireWire Target Disk mode to directly attach a drive to a system, HFS+ will work on any recent (8.6+? 9.0+? I forget which) OS. Since you're probably not using Target Disk Mode with the Performa, this probably isn't an issue.

In short, the performa will be able to read/write to any shared disk attached to the iMac.

However, I wouldn't follow your thinking on partition scheme. There's really no/little need to have separate partitions for Mac OS 9 and X. I'd go with one big partition for the whole lot, or maybe one small partition for an emergency startup volume.
Gods don't kill people - people with Gods kill people.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2002, 11:02 PM
 
Just to offer another point of view, here are some reasons to keep OS 9 and X on different partiions:
  • You can use the option keep during startup to select which OS to boot (no need for startup-disk control panel)
  • If you find you don't like/want OS X anymore, it's easier to get rid of it on another partition.
  • I've found defragging the partion with OS 9 and OS X made X run more slowly.
Of course I'm only giving more information. I have both OSes on the same partition, if you care to know.


Brad
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2