Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Classic Macs and Mac OS > Future Classic environments....

Future Classic environments....
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: SouthBank, Victoria, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 04:06 AM
 
For anyone that knows... what will be the last updates of classic as standalone application... not running under classic env in X?

I know 9.1 is last commercial MacOS in box, whereas every other update after that has not been, unless you buy a G4 machine...

and I'm pretty sure 9.2, you require at least 9.1 to install prior?

anyways... If say I bought myself the newer G4s does that mean I can only run MacOS classic applications under X emulation?
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Southfield, MI, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 08:17 AM
 
I'm sure the only updates to Mac OS9 will be so that it can still boot on new Macs (like the coming-someday G5s). Eventually, Apple will not update OS9 at all and you may only be able to run it as Classic in OSX with NO BOOTING into OS9. And then, someday, OSX will be classic free...

I don't expect "Classic-free" for at least 5 or more years...
Dan
"I guarantee that I am correct."
(not a guarantee)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 10:36 AM
 
9.2.1 is installable from a CD on an empty HD. There is no need for a prior install.

As for updates to OS 9. I HIGHLY doubt it. 9.2.2 is probably THE last update from Apple you will get. Here was a big hint:

<img src="http://idisk.mac.com/shekwan/Public/MacNN/WWDC/6.jpg" alt=" - " />

Mac Guru
"The young people of America need be taught that the only pride they may properly hold is in the content of their character, and the achievements they make. There is no legitimate pride or moral credit to be gained by virtue of sharing the same race with a great and admirable individual. "

My Website
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 11:08 AM
 
I would be surprised if Apple didn't come out with a few more little updates for OS 9... just to keep some things compatible for the older machines.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 01:56 PM
 
Why would Apple release an update to something they no longer support? Doesn't make sense.

Mac Guru
"The young people of America need be taught that the only pride they may properly hold is in the content of their character, and the achievements they make. There is no legitimate pride or moral credit to be gained by virtue of sharing the same race with a great and admirable individual. "

My Website
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 04:46 PM
 
I'm not saying they are going to improve on the OS, just keep it alive for all of those people that still have non G3 systems... There are a bunch out there...
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 06:42 PM
 
No, no, it's not a matter of updates for keeping a current updates for pre-G3s. It is dead in that respect - has been since the release of 9.2 which is G3 and higher only.

But Apple will most definitely continue to release compatibility updates so that the classic environment can run on new machines. It will probably be some time before Apple precludes booting into OS 9, since a lot of professionals still rely on it. There are still far too many users of OS 9 for Apple to not allow it to run.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 22, 2002, 01:46 AM
 
The only update I see in the future is making OS 9 a "VPC HardDrive" of sorts. Not a real OS, but a compatablility layer to run older apps in. Since Apple has said they're not supporting it, I don't see them chaning the machines enough to break OS 9 so they have to update it.

Mac Guru
"The young people of America need be taught that the only pride they may properly hold is in the content of their character, and the achievements they make. There is no legitimate pride or moral credit to be gained by virtue of sharing the same race with a great and admirable individual. "

My Website
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 22, 2002, 02:12 AM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by Mac Guru:
<strong>The only update I see in the future is making OS 9 a "VPC HardDrive" of sorts. Not a real OS, but a compatablility layer to run older apps in. Since Apple has said they're not supporting it, I don't see them chaning the machines enough to break OS 9 so they have to update it.

Mac Guru</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Turning Classic into an emulated virtual machine only makes sense if it is less costly to do so than to consistently provide small compatibility updates that let it run on new hardware. However, I don't know what point you're making when you state that Apple probably won't change the machines enough to break OS 9. Every moderate hardware revision has always required at the minimum an updated system enabler. In any case, Apple didn't say they weren't supporting OS 9. What SJ did say is OS 9 is officially dead to Apple's developers.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the Classic environment going forward. As I previously stated, OS 9 will be bootable for quite sometime, I believe. As for Classic, I imagine that as the speeds of our machines continue to increase (hopefully ), the most probable thing is the Classic loading process will get faster and faster. Eventually Classic will be fast enough to load in the background during the startup process, with no speed penalty. I also bet Classic could probably boot more quickly currently, but it doesn't since Apple has a vested interest in making it slower.

<small>[ 06-22-2002, 01:19 AM: Message edited by: Big Mac ]</small>

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
my7200  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: SouthBank, Victoria, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2002, 12:57 AM
 
umm... the only reason why I ask... is because Classic and Native seem like two different things... for example certain API's aren't there under Classic/Carbon crap, I still wish to use certain API's to program my stuff... I don't perticulary like X... and to me code for STAND ALONE 9 doesn't equal Classic code which I assume is anything after 9.1.

Any comments?

cheers
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle
     
CIA
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 10, 2002, 06:45 AM
 
They might post a few small updates still, just to keep the newer machines able to run classic.
Work: 2008 8x3.2 MacPro, 8800GT, 16GB ram, zillions of HDs. (video editing)
Home: 2008 24" 2.8 iMac, 2TB Int, 4GB ram.
Road: 2009 13" 2.26 Macbook Pro, 8GB ram & 640GB WD blue internal
Retired to BOINC only: My trusty never-gonna-die 12" iBook G4 1.25
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: under about 12 feet of ash from Mt. Vesuvius
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 10, 2002, 10:23 AM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by my7200:
<strong>umm... the only reason why I ask... is because Classic and Native seem like two different things... for example certain API's aren't there under Classic/Carbon crap, I still wish to use certain API's to program my stuff... I don't perticulary like X... and to me code for STAND ALONE 9 doesn't equal Classic code which I assume is anything after 9.1.

Any comments?

cheers</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">hmm interesting---which API's? i'd doubt if any further updates to 9 didn't incorporate "Classic" code. maybe you could elaborate a bit more on the difference between standalone 9 and classic 9?
i look in your general direction
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2