Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Classic Macs and Mac OS > Info on 68k chips

Info on 68k chips
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Carbondale, IL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 9, 2001, 08:30 PM
 
does anybody know of a website that has benchmarks on the older 68k chips.

im trying to find out how much faster a 25mhz 040 is over a 25mhz 030 etc....
AIM: bmichel5581
MacBook 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB
     
<SpinyNorman>
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Aug 10, 2001, 10:40 PM
 
Macspeedzone.com has what you're looking for (although I can't understand why).
http://macspeedzone.com/

Click on the "Old Macs" tab and then go to early 1995.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: california
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2001, 02:11 PM
 
if you're familiar with PC chips, the motorola 68030 -&gt; 68040 is very similar to intel's move from 386 -&gt; 486. there is an 8k cache embedded on the chip which speeds things up dramatically.
also, there is info at motorola's website:

68030: http://e-www.motorola.com/collateral/LIBMC68030.html
68040: http://e-www.motorola.com/collateral/LIBMC68040.html
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Rolling Hills of Wheat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2001, 04:03 AM
 
This is purely anicdotal, but the speed and performance improvement between the 030 and 040 is based more on the advances of chip integration and less an actual change in the archetecture. 030s never had a math co-processor or floating point unit embeded in it. The floating point system usually consisted of a Motorola 68882 math co-processor adjoining it on the motherboard. In the case of a full blown 040, the math co was on chip, like so many of our modern RISC processors and the Intel processors. The LC040 didn't have a math co, making it a much less desireable chip and today feels significantly more sluggish than a full 040 running at the same clock rate.

From my experience the IIfx, which had a 40Mhz 030 and a math co performed to a level aproximately equivelant to a Quadra 610 or possible 650. I still have a Quadra 950 in production for email and general AppleTalk serving. It is not the fastest or most efficient machine in the world, but it holds its own. I would not try the same tasks on a IIfx despite its beefieness.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2