 |
 |
Why Is Expensive Hardware Needed to Watch TV?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can someone enlighten me why expensive hardware is needed to watch TV on the new iMac? Once upon a time I hooked up my VCR to the Mac with a RCA plug and used Apple Video software to watch TV. This was on an AV Mac (7500 PPC) but my point is that it was very easy.
What prevents someone from making an inexpensive jack that can take the feed from a VCR and allow it to be used either via USB or Firewire on the iMac?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just buy the eye TV from elgato. So simple to set-up.
Originally posted by j45degrees:
Can someone enlighten me why expensive hardware is needed to watch TV on the new iMac? Once upon a time I hooked up my VCR to the Mac with a RCA plug and used Apple Video software to watch TV. This was on an AV Mac (7500 PPC) but my point is that it was very easy.
What prevents someone from making an inexpensive jack that can take the feed from a VCR and allow it to be used either via USB or Firewire on the iMac?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by j45degrees:
Can someone enlighten me why expensive hardware is needed to watch TV on the new iMac? Once upon a time I hooked up my VCR to the Mac with a RCA plug and used Apple Video software to watch TV. This was on an AV Mac (7500 PPC) but my point is that it was very easy.
What prevents someone from making an inexpensive jack that can take the feed from a VCR and allow it to be used either via USB or Firewire on the iMac?
Most people don't buy a computer to watch TV on it and that's probbably one of the main reasons why it's still so expensive. Until there is more demand for it in the market we will just have to sit back and wait for the prices to lower.
As Apple develops larger, higher resolution diplays it's becoming more desirable to watch DVD's and perhaps even TV, so I don't think were that far off from seeing an affordable solution.
Noah
|
|
Macbook 2.0 Ghz - Black
iPhone 4GB - Fido
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status:
Offline
|
|
eyetv from elgato.com and formac.com's studioDV/tv solution both work well.
Why are they required? Because Apple no longer bundles a TV tuner (hardware) into the Macintosh.
|
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by vmarks:
eyetv from elgato.com and formac.com's studioDV/tv solution both work well.
Why are they required? Because Apple no longer bundles a TV tuner (hardware) into the Macintosh.
Ok that explains it nicely. So there's not going to be a cheap solution ever, I simply have to get the tuner. Is the Formac solution the better of the two?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you want a cheap alternative and you already have a VCR, you can check out Interview Lite ($40), a a USB cable that accepts either s-video or composite inputs from NTSC, PAL and SECAM video sources.
http://www.echofx.com/
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by spiff41398:
If you want a cheap alternative and you already have a VCR, you can check out Interview Lite ($40), a a USB cable that accepts either s-video or composite inputs from NTSC, PAL and SECAM video sources.
http://www.echofx.com/
This is the type of thing I was reffering to originally. Have you tried this yourself? The maximum window size is 352 x 240?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by j45degrees:
This is the type of thing I was reffering to originally. Have you tried this yourself? The maximum window size is 352 x 240?
The 352x240 maximum window size is likley because of USB's slow speed.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can actually scale up the window size to fullscreen. It's not 30fps but it's watchable.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
Isn't EyeTV 320X240 I was wondering if you have a usb port on the back of the cable box whats stoping me from running a usb cable from the cable box to the MAC.
|
With some loud music + a friend to chat nearby you can get alot done. - but jezz, I'd avoid it if I had the choice---- If only real people came with Alpha Channels.......:)
AIM:xflaer
deinterlaced.com
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
The small resolution is because that's the NTSC standard singal resolution, not because of USB or anything. HDTV is better, but I don't know of any way to get those signals to a Mac.
As for the USB on some cable boxes, its probably there for the service people to fix the box or configure it for that specific cable company's signal. It probably has nothing to do with sending video out of it... but I guess it wouldn't hurt to try 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2000
Location: northeast PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by tarkap:
The small resolution is because that's the NTSC standard singal resolution, not because of USB or anything.
USB 1.x bandwidth creates a bottleneck that makes it difficult to capture higher than 320*240 res video in real time. That's why most USB devices are rated at less than 1/4 of the typical NTSC signal resolution (320*240 vs 720*480). IIRC, there was a product annoucement recently of an upcoming USB capture device that uses compression to allow 720*480 video over USB 1.x. But for the remaining USB devices you're going to be limited to around 320*240 resolution.......joe
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is why the formac solution is better- it's a firewire device, allowing the full size NTSC signal to come through.
Granted, it's more expensive as well.
The problem with going directly from your cable box to Mac over USB is, do you have a Mac driver for your cable box? do you know if that's just an interface for the cable provider to program the box, not actually output video over?
|
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by vmarks:
This is why the formac solution is better- it's a firewire device, allowing the full size NTSC signal to come through.
Granted, it's more expensive as well.
As long as the Formac device lasts for a few years I guess it would be safe to stick with this solution.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|