 |
 |
how to close the Mhz gap
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is what apple will probely do to close the Mhz gap and keep the price resionable. They can still make g4's but make them go to speeds of 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 then they make the g5 with speeds of 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 that way they can get a big leep and would help them out possibly. cuase a 1.4 g4 and a 1.6 g4 speed wise wont make that much of a different but would make it so that the g5 can compeat with the p4 and amd athlon xp. that would be a great marketing stragity. and if they do it all with in a tight time period it would make perfect scence. and then they can keep using the g4 for the imacs like every month they roll out to till they ketch up.
(Last edited by yoyoman; Jun 22, 2003 at 12:31 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Syracuse
Status:
Offline
|
|
riight...in a perfect world.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Weezer:
riight...in a perfect world.
still if they did that it would so work out. RIght? what are your thoughts.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by yoyoman:
This is what apple will probely do to close the Mhz gap and keep the price resionable. They still make g4's but make them go to speeds of 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 then they make the g5 with speeds of 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 th at way hey can get a big leep and would help them out possibly. cuase a 1.4g4 and a 1.6 g4 speed wise wont make that much of a different but would make it so that the g5 can compeat with the p4 and amd athlon xp. that would be a great marketing stragity. and if they do it all with in a tight time period it would make perfect scence. and then they can keep using the g4 for the imacs
Dude, you are by far my favorite poster on MacNN.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Syracuse
Status:
Offline
|
|
There is a reason we dont have 2 ghz G4s right now, they arn't going to magically be fabricated. Your predictions are impossible with the current chip market. People were surprised when the 2 ghz 970 was slipped, because the talk was that the highest chip being produced was 1.8, so don't expect a 2.6 970 to show up on monday.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by aaanorton:
Dude, you are by far my favorite poster on MacNN.
I aggre compleately! Yo YoMan, may u nevr lern howe to spel!
|
|
Michael: Hasn't everything been sort of discovered now by like Magellan and Cortez?
Buster: Oh, yeah yeah, those guys did a pretty good job.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
*I am so confused right now.*
|
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
A dual 2GHz PPC 970 (or one on its own) would destroy a 3GHz P4 (and faster) anyway, so what's the big deal?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In support of our troops
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why would making a 1.6ghz G4 suddenly make it possible to make a 2.6ghz G5? If Apple could make a machine with a 2.6ghz chip, they sure as hell would be selling it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
yoyoman, don't take this the wrong way, but PLEASE take an English class. It makes it much easier to understand what you are saying and removes confusion. At the least, use a spell checker before you post.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
A G4 need to reach 6.5 GHz to get the FPU performance of the old classic P4 3.06 GHz. Why wip the G4 donky?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by DrBoar:
Why wip the G4 donky?
agreed.
and do you REALLY think that apple would sell six different (yet similar) towers at the same time... sounds like performa madness to me (gags self with fork)
|

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by DrBoar:
A G4 need to reach 6.5 GHz to get the FPU performance of the old classic P4 3.06 GHz. Why wip the G4 donky?
would need
whip
donkey
|
|
[vash:~] banana% killall killall
Terminated
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Whipping a donkey is cruelty to animals! I protest!
MODERATORS: Please lock this animal-abuse promoting thread!
|
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by yoyoman:
This is what apple will probely do to close the Mhz gap and keep the price resionable. They can still make g4's but make them go to speeds of 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 then they make the g5 with speeds of 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 that way they can get a big leep and would help them out possibly. cuase a 1.4 g4 and a 1.6 g4 speed wise wont make that much of a different but would make it so that the g5 can compeat with the p4 and amd athlon xp. that would be a great marketing stragity. and if they do it all with in a tight time period it would make perfect scence. and then they can keep using the g4 for the imacs like every month they roll out to till they ketch up.
What about human abuse?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Geeze.
The poor donkey.
I'm calling PETA.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|