 |
 |
Xserve G5, when?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
So when?
I'd expect it to be several months after the G5 Power Macs ship, or perhaps later around when the time when the rev. B Power Macs come out. It gives them time to work out the kinks for a server class product. ie. The Power Mac end users are the guinea pigs.  (Good reason to consider rev. B too, if you can wait on a new Power Mac.)
Another reason for a later release is Panther.
I also wonder when the IBM blades will be released with these chips. Things have been quiet on that front.
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Jun 25, 2003 at 12:09 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: No frelling idea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, a total guess, I said a few months after the G5's ship. I am just wondering about the heat. How well are the servers doing? How much of a redesign will they require if any? Apple did know the G5's were coming, or so they claimed to be working on it for years. I think sooner than later. Is it possible and/or practical for Xserve to use the Power4 chips instead? Would Apple do this if they could?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmmm... POWER4? I don't think they're going to jump in with that any time soon. They'd have a major problem trying to put a POWER4 in a 1U rack server, plus it's $$$$$. Indeed, I wonder how much design tinkering it will take to put the hot PPC 970 (compared to the G4) in a 1U.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The City Of Diamonds
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug Wanker:
Hmmm... POWER4? I don't think they're going to jump in with that any time soon. They'd have a major problem trying to put a POWER4 in a 1U rack server, plus it's $$$$$. Indeed, I wonder how much design tinkering it will take to put the hot PPC 970 (compared to the G4) in a 1U.
The PowerXServe with Power4  . They could make a second server model that's not a 1U.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tronna
Status:
Offline
|
|
No Power4 for Xserves, G5 Xserve shipping October/November, depending on how fast they learn how to cool the damn things
You know, I really want a new G5, but after comparing my single G4 to a dual, all I know is I REALLY want a dual G5, and I also know that rev 1 Apple hardware is flakey as hell. Damn, when are the rev 2s coming out?! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Powaqqatsi:
The PowerXServe with Power4 . They could make a second server model that's not a 1U.
I don't think that's gonna happen either. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think heat in a 1U is really that much of a problem, let's face it, you can get dual Athlons and Racksaver even claim to have dual Itanium2 in a 1U.....
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by power142:
I don't think heat in a 1U is really that much of a problem, let's face it, you can get dual Athlons and Racksaver even claim to have dual Itanium2 in a 1U.....
You're wrong... it's most defininitely a problem. Heat in the 1U is an issue... it can be dealt with a bit.
But the big problem is, if they GENERATE a lot of heat, the "single server" case isn't that big of a deal. But if you rack 42 of 'em in the same rack (and this is very common!), the whole thing generates GOBS of heat. It can overwhelm your data center, and make you pay tens or hundreds of thousands for equipment to cool the room. This gets very expensive.
For that reason, most Intel-based 1U servers today are still selling with the Pentium 3 based Xeons. They are 1.4 GHz for the most part. The 3 GHz 1U models just started shipping about a month ago!
Processor speed isn't often the most important thing in a rack mount server. Because often they're doing file serving or web serving and that's more network/IO dependent than CPU dependent.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Remember also that Xserves aren't blades. They can have 4 hard drives for instance.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CatOne:
You're wrong... it's most defininitely a problem. Heat in the 1U is an issue... it can be dealt with a bit.
But the big problem is, if they GENERATE a lot of heat, the "single server" case isn't that big of a deal. But if you rack 42 of 'em in the same rack (and this is very common!), the whole thing generates GOBS of heat. It can overwhelm your data center, and make you pay tens or hundreds of thousands for equipment to cool the room. This gets very expensive.
Funny... the original poster didn't ask about heat being an issue in a FULL RACK of Xserves, just a 1U unit 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by power142:
Funny... the original poster didn't ask about heat being an issue in a FULL RACK of Xserves, just a 1U unit
So you think they should sell a 1U server that is non-rackable? Or was your comment in jest?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|