Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > apple says they use the fastest ram

apple says they use the fastest ram
Thread Tools
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 05:33 PM
 
ddr 3200 is not the fastest. 3700 is. What is the deal when steve said hottest ram money cam buy. ?!?!?
(Last edited by yoyoman; Jun 27, 2003 at 06:28 PM. )
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 05:50 PM
 
Check their prices on additional PC-3200 RAM. Perhaps you misremembered, and Steve actually said "most expensive RAM money can buy"?
     
yoyoman  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 06:28 PM
 
Originally posted by reader50:
Check their prices on additional PC-3200 RAM. Perhaps you misremembered, and Steve actually said "most expensive RAM money can buy"?

He did say hotest memory mony can buy.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 06:30 PM
 
hottest does not mean fastest
     
exa
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 06:31 PM
 
RDF = Reality Distortion Field
     
yoyoman  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 06:51 PM
 
Originally posted by CheesePuff:
hottest does not mean fastest

so y dont they use 3700
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 07:03 PM
 
Think Bang for you Buck.

1 GB Samsung 3700 RAM: $325
1 GB Samsung 3200 RAM: $188

Do you think the extra performance you could sqeeze out of the higher clocked RAM would be worth the money?

Any hardware experts that can give us the scoop on 3700 vs. 3200 RAM?
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 07:20 PM
 
3200 is, or almost is, a JDEC standard.
3700 is not, and may never be.
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 07:28 PM
 
What about 3500?
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 07:32 PM
 
3200 = the fastest JDEC spec
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2003, 07:36 PM
 
Originally posted by Scotttheking:
3200 = the fastest JDEC spec
The man has spoken. BOW TO THE G5!
     
yoyoman  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2003, 06:07 PM
 
Originally posted by DeathMan:
The man has spoken. BOW TO THE G5!

yea but theres 3700 as well.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2003, 07:10 PM
 
Originally posted by yoyoman:
yea but theres 3700 as well.
yeah, but the point it a memory manudfacturer can claim their ram can run a whatever speed they want above PC3200. If they say it is PC3200, then it has to meet JDEC spec, which is the highest offically regulated speed.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2003, 07:18 PM
 
That PC150 and PC166 stuff never took off either. DDR came and made it obsolete.

Apple is probably using the hotest "industry standard" RAM. It helps keep prices down instead of them buying weird, unofficial, non-standards-following stuff. It ensures more consistent performance.

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2003, 03:46 AM
 
what they say is true. If you get a quality stick of 2700 you could overclock it and call it 3200. which is all the 3700 is, overclocked 3200's
Force
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2003, 04:40 PM
 
Originally posted by yoyoman:
yea but theres 3700 as well.
Why do you always keep posting the same question, even when it's been answered?!?

PC3700 doesn't exist as a standard (just as ATA/133 doesn't). Sure, it's been done, but it's not a standard, and Apple would be incredibly stupid to design a system that used unstandardized RAM. (Doing so could have the effect of making the necessary RAM unavailable in the future.)

tooki
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2003, 04:48 PM
 
Originally posted by tooki:
Why do you always keep posting the same question, even when it's been answered?!?

PC3700 doesn't exist as a standard (just as ATA/133 doesn't). Sure, it's been done, but it's not a standard, and Apple would be incredibly stupid to design a system that used unstandardized RAM. (Doing so could have the effect of making the necessary RAM unavailable in the future.)

tooki
While I agree with you about the ram, i was just going to ruin your point by pointing out that Apple does use ATA/133 in its G4 towers. Luckily I had the sense to double check before I made that claim, because they DON'T. Yikes.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2